When I was growing up, I actually considered a career in politics. I quickly changed my mind, though, when I discovered that there was way too much politics involved in it. Obviously, that's a play on words, but I get funny looks from people when I tell them that. However, I am completely serious. The politics of running for and holding elective office is influenced too much by the politics of power, influence, and money. But whose fault is it that such a condition exists? I believe voters have no one to blame but themselves.
As a voting public, we have become entirely too sophisticated for our own good. Many of us have made a habit of voting pragmatically, i.e., voting for the person we think has the best chance to win instead of the person we most agree with. We complain about wishy-washy politicians who won't give us straight answers, yet when people who say what they really think run for office, we dismiss them as being "loose cannons." When any candidate makes a statement that's evenly slightly out of the mainstream, it is considered such an egregious act that he or she either becomes marginalized or is forced to drop out of the race. What's left is a bunch of cautious and robotic weenies with their fingers in the wind - people who form their decisions based on polls and focus groups.
We say we want candidates who are different, but not too different. We say we want new ideas but we shun candidates that seem the least bit precocious. Therefore, we end up with the kinds of candidates we've always had.
I've often heard voters comment on candidates by making statements like "I couldn't imagine her being elected" or "he sends shivers down my spine." Most people will automatically exclude any candidate who would fit those kinds of descriptions. But should they? Sometimes good candidates come in packages that might be a little different or even a bit scary. By disqualifying those types of candidates, we could be missing out on some potentially great leaders. I wonder how many of today's sophisticated voters would consider someone like Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, or Teddy Roosevelt too much of a "nut" to be elected.
We like to say the issues are the important things to us. However, many of us vote based on personalities. For example, we will decide on a presidential candidate based on who seems the most "presidential" (whatever that means). We are also too concerned about meaningless ceremonial issues. For example, I bet some people wouldn't vote for an unmarried man for president because of their concern about the absence of a first lady. We also put too great of an emphasis on superficial issues such as aesthetics, i.e., how someone looks. Richard Nixon may have lost the 1960 election because he didn't look as good on TV as John F. Kennedy during their debate.
We also stress a candidate's education a little too much. Education is important, but it's not everything. Some of smartest people in the world never attended college. However, many of us wouldn't consider someone for any office higher than dog catcher unless he or she had at least a Bachelor's degree.
Many voters make their ballot selections based on personal greed instead of what's best for their country, state, district, or locality. They will reserve their votes for politicians whom they think will give them things and/or make life easier for them. Of course, Politicians constantly exploit this greed by making outlandish promises. Once these politicians are elected, they either have to renege on those promises or create budget deficits in order to bring them about.
Other voters, while not so much motivated by personal greed, will vote based on localized interests at the expense of the more general interests. For example, they might vote for a particular congressional candidate because they think he will bring a lot of goodies to their district. This mentality also helps to forge a cycle of promises, broken promises, and budget deficits. Until voters begin to put the general good ahead of personal and parochial interests, these problems will persist.
We like to blame the news media for all of the "gotcha" political stories that pry too deeply into the personal lives and distant past history of candidates and therefore keep many good and qualified people out the political arena. However, it is ultimately our fault because we eat that stuff up. We can't get enough of it. The more dirt the news outlets dig up on various candidates, the more we buy their newspapers and tune in to their TV and radio stations for more of those stories. The sad part is that we allow that stuff to influence our votes. Most of it is irrelevant to the issues at hand and should not be taken seriously by voters. We do usually ignore the parts about the candidates or parties we like, but we tend to believe the parts about the candidates or parties we don't like. Therefore, the news media keeps feeding us this garbage.
Last but not least, one of our biggest problems is our unwillingness to vote for independent or third party candidates. These candidates generally do not have obligations to party bosses or quid pro quo relationships with lobbyists like the major party candidates do. Very often, we will vote for the lesser of two evils, rather than an independent or third party candidate who might be much better. Of course, when you vote for the lesser of two evils, you're still voting for an evil. Many people feel like they would be wasting their vote by voting for any of those other candidates. This is simply not true. A voter only wastes his/her vote when he/she votes for someone he/she does not really like. Instead, we create a voting catch-22 for ourselves, i.e., no one will vote for Mr. Independent because he has no chance; Mr. Independent has no chance because no one will vote for him. If enough people decided to start voting their conscience, we could break that vicious cycle.
Terry Mitchell is a software engineer, freelance writer, and trivia buff from Hopewell, VA. He also serves as a political columnist for American Daily and operates his own website - http://www.commenterry.com - on which he posts commentaries on various subjects such as politics, technology, religion, health and well-being, personal finance, and sports. His commentaries offer a unique point of view that is not often found in mainstream media.
Lincoln Stretch rentals Alsip ..City Governments is their quest for; "quality of life" often... Read More
The second amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees every American... Read More
There are no stupid questions, only stupid people. Ask an... Read More
For anyone who wishes to become an armchair General in... Read More
Ever wonder why labor unions consistently endorse democrats over republicans... Read More
The notion that local governments should have almost total monopoly... Read More
The idea that the majority shows the will of the... Read More
In what the Americans love to describe as the war... Read More
I read an interesting article in foreign Affairs magazine last... Read More
To be justified, taxes should satisfy a few conditions:Above all,... Read More
You are not going to believe what is going on... Read More
The No Child Left Behind can work if the Federal... Read More
The Iranian elections are certainly interesting indeed. The ruling party... Read More
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Was created on July 30th 2002, by... Read More
These leaders like the Rothschilds who backed Crowley's Hermetic Order... Read More
With people living longer we have some problems as those... Read More
The official figures are staggering: 35% of the workforce -... Read More
This brings to our consciousness, issues concerning the ever rising... Read More
The debate to raise minimum wage in California is totally... Read More
Why President Bush should have his second term? The arguments... Read More
As a result of the conflict analysis exercise and a... Read More
Where are all the high-speed trains we were promised? Where... Read More
Land Mines have been one of the most evil left... Read More
The most damaging factor to our economy today is the... Read More
Hello! Happy new year. May you live a long healthy... Read More
Western Springs shuttle limo ..In many reports we see that the Federal Trade Commission... Read More
The clause (c) of Electronic Crime Act 2004 has been... Read More
Without the flow of fuel our very mobile society comes... Read More
America is filled with standouts and perserverance; our nation has... Read More
The Second World War was the continuation of World War... Read More
We have brain drain issues in Silicon Valley, we have... Read More
The US-backed Road Map peace plan had no real chance... Read More
Many had made mention of the problems of business opportunities... Read More
The Republican Party became popular due to its view on... Read More
Introduction:Although politicians and so-called "Intelligence Experts" are the ones appearing... Read More
In the previous article, we described the various methods developed... Read More
One question not addressed in GM Crops and Monsanto Terminator... Read More
Many people do not understand politics very well. They often... Read More
"The Jesuit priest John H. Surratt, proven to be the... Read More
The City of Portland is going after any small business,... Read More
The expertise and advancement of the evolution of man and... Read More
I. WARS ARE BASIC CONFLICTS OVER LAND. II. BOUNDARIES. THE... Read More
The devastating loss in case of Elliot Spitzer for NY... Read More
We have known of the innate characteristic need of members... Read More
The UnbornWith all this cloning in the news one can't... Read More
Corporate America has been shaken recently by lawsuits and criminal... Read More
Well, another election has come and gone in the US... Read More
Americans pride themselves on being the best, that's a fact.... Read More
China maybe stopping some of the SPAM coming into the... Read More
As baby boomers, we have been spoiled all of our... Read More
Political |