There are no stupid questions, only stupid people. Ask an economist for proof of one of their pet theories and you'll find quickly that the age old axiom that we all learned in school and work place training seminars is dead wrong. You can ask a stupid question if you're talking to an economist and that question can, in fact, make you stupid.
It's a well accepted fact that scientists are not the greatest communicators around. They generally are not strong in the customer service or public relations fields. Scientists spend their time preaching to the well educated, well informed, scientific choir. When the time comes that a scientific discovery leads to a consumer product, it is not scientists that explain the benefits and dangers of the new product, a marketing company will handle that. Because of the disconnect between the science behind a product and the actual implementation of that science, there are a slew of products which are around 1.25% scientific fact and 98.75% marketing hype (take a look at your average diet pill). Consumers don't know the difference because scientists won't talk to us.
Economists also fancy themselves as scientists. They like to say that they have laws and they also don't feel the need to deign to speak to the general public about their work. They talk to each other, develop their theories, push for the implementation of those theories and generally think that Liberal Arts majors and auto mechanics should mind their own business. Maybe it's time that we lowly non-economists demand a few answers.
It's tremendously irksome to hear an economist speak about an economic law. Ask the economist to demonstrate the law and he will fall quickly to an explanation of the theories which, in his opinion, make the law true. Supply and Demand can only be verified by reading those theorists who endorse the idea. The theory cannot be measured, cannot be duplicated under scientific standards, cannot be certain to have the same outcome at all times, even given the same circumstances. It is therefore not a law. It's just a widely accepted theory.
I've got no problem with widely accepted theories. What I do find disturbing and even dangerous is the application of widely accepted theories into public policy without regard to whom is being hurt and without question as to whether or not the theory is working.
Take free trade for instance. It's an economic policy which is not demanded by the average working person, but which both major political parties endorse to some extent and which the Libertarian Party makes a cornerstone of it's platform. The theories all indicate that some job loss, even great displacement of a given society's workers, is to be expected. In fact, the displacement is a good thing, since it allows once unskilled laborers to study and become highly skilled technitions, or accountants or something. Unfortunately, the American people aren't privy to this part of the working economic theory and thusly aren't excited to hear that the reason that their job was offshore is due to India's comparative advantage in call center operations. The displaced worker may not feel that they are a worthy subject for the grand experiment of free trade.
Of course, no theory says that America has to be the winner in the free trade free-for-all rush to the top of the comparative/absolute advantage heap. No, economists don't often talk about nations at all. Their theories do not aim to find ways of make America the most economically powerful nation, or the richest, or the most comfortable; their theories work to ensure a true free market. The problem with a truly free market is that the displaced workers can just as easily be upper middle class Americans and the new skills that they may be acquiring just may be menial labor. Ask an economist why the displaced workers are always poor and always must be and I'll bet you money that they cannot give even a small piece of evidence to show a reason why that is so.
Yet our politicians, being taught economics in universities which are almost universally in support of free trade, themselves support free trade. They support an economic theory that has no evidence of actually being affective, but which may cause damage to the American economy, a fact which any honest free trade supporting economist would have to admit doesn't matter to them. Yet, the average person is not supposed to question these theories and certainly not the logic of the theorocrats that endorse them. If you fail to remain quietly on the sidelines of history and make the mistake of questioning the theory behind free trade, then you will be the recipient of a litany of the names of long dead authors who will all prove you wrong. You'll be called an idiot (trust me, I've had these discussions), they will threaten your mother's virtue before they admit that they can provide no evidence that they are correct.
Does a lack of evidence prove that the economists are wrong? Not at all. In fact, my desire for evidence is proof that I don't know enough about economics to ask more informed questions than, "can you prove that?" I do think, though, that is a damn fine place to start. Maybe more economists should start their path of theoretical enlightenment by questioning the fundamental truth of what they are being taught. Maybe economists should consider being the first scientists to learn customer service. If that seems like a bit of a demotion, just call it retraining for new economic conditions.
About The Author
Donald R. Carroll III is a student, insurance adjuster and freelance writer from Kansas City, Missouri.
Lincoln Stretch rentals Alsip ..Do you ever wonder how everything gets to the super... Read More
There are no stupid questions, only stupid people. Ask an... Read More
Currently the US Army is having trouble recruiting. These problems... Read More
The devastating loss in case of Elliot Spitzer for NY... Read More
Year Item Price Rate of Inflation 03/80 Gasoline (per gallon)... Read More
Their arrival portends rising local prices and a culture shock.... Read More
We are destroying our freedoms and slowing innovation, due to... Read More
[Author's Note: Another essay that I wrote on notebook paper... Read More
In the event of that a threatening nation to the... Read More
Many non-profit groups are feeling upset that they are allowed... Read More
Expected new applications for Mexican trucks to enter the US... Read More
The organic farmers are angry that Monsantos terminator GM seeds... Read More
Government budgets represent between 25% and 50% of he Gross... Read More
In typical bureaucratese, the pensive EBRD analyst ventures with the... Read More
An irresponsible Chinese General made a very telling comment recently.... Read More
Why did the California energy crisis happen? Who is to... Read More
The FTC franchising division purports their law enforcement experience in... Read More
Corporate America has been shaken recently by lawsuits and criminal... Read More
30 years ago, California, later followed by other states, decided... Read More
In what the Americans love to describe as the war... Read More
The NSA failed the American people and allowed the attack... Read More
Businesses advertising alcohol either in TV or non-broadcast format need... Read More
We need more oversight and transparency in government. We need... Read More
Telemarketing and DO NOT CALL lists sure made headlines, but... Read More
The TSA seems to have completely missed the ball at... Read More
Western Springs shuttle limo ..The FBI recently before Congress stated that Eco-Terrorism was on... Read More
What depth of blind insanity has inflicted itself upon Israel's... Read More
We have known of the innate characteristic need of members... Read More
Telemarketing and DO NOT CALL lists sure made headlines, but... Read More
We need more oversight and transparency in government. We need... Read More
Visible remnants of the world's eldest democracy can be seen... Read More
Rational, sober, logical citizens wonder what exactly the terrorists want.... Read More
Britain has a proud tradition of valiant armed forces and... Read More
Capitalism as the social structure was founded in order to... Read More
Back-Dooring the CSIS:The US and Israel have admitted they back-doored... Read More
As you can see from some of our previous articles,... Read More
As the populations expand in Colorado outside of Denver, Las... Read More
"The Jesuit priest John H. Surratt, proven to be the... Read More
The current political efforts aimed at improving the American public... Read More
Why is it that every single thing government does; it... Read More
One third of all fertilized eggs spontaneously abort and are... Read More
A governing.com report blast one of the major grassroots initiatives... Read More
Up until the final debate at Arizona State University, the... Read More
The Iranian elections are certainly interesting indeed. The ruling party... Read More
Having been to every city in the country over the... Read More
Many MLM sales people mean well but they inadvertently commit... Read More
In his bid for the presidency, John Kerry pronounced a... Read More
In the fields of juvenile justice policy and programming, there... Read More
In many reports we see that the Federal Trade Commission... Read More
It looks overall like the liberals are advocating for no... Read More
Political |