Is the only way to fight Fundamentalist Extremists becoming one yourself? Having grown up in a liberal democracy, being educated in the ideals of freedom of speech and expression, diversity, multi-culturalism and the political correctness that stems from such a comprehensive education, I find myself questioning whether I am a closet fascist when it comes to the way in which the British Judiciary are referring to the whole issue surrounding the London suicide bombers of 7 July and the related legal news stories stemming from this.
I cannot understand the logic of the British Judiciary in countering the British Government's call for the expulsion of a number of foreign nationals specifically identified as contributing to anti-British feeling amongst the Muslim community. For example, one of the people due for expulsion is Abu Qatada, a Jordanian who has been tried and convicted in his absence in Jordanian courts for terrorism and given a life sentence. He is known as Osama bin Laden's 'Ambassador in Europe'. Now he is concerned that if he is returned to Jordan he will face the death sentence. The question becomes one of whether we can expel someone from Britain to what may be their death? While we don't know the details of his Jordanian convictions, terrorism in the Middle East tends to be pretty deadly, so it is fair to suspect this person has been convicted of something relating to people being killed.
This is where liberal ideals and common-sense conflict ? while we may agree in Human Rights Law, is it so wrong if we don't care that this man is being sent back to what might be his death? When someone commits themselves to terrorism, do they give up their right to justice when they so blatantly abuse it? How can we allow someone to rely on Human Rights law when they have so obviously overlooked the human rights of everyone else in the country? On a more local level, why do we have someone at liberty in Britain who has been convicted of terrorism in another country? Why were they being granted freedom of speech, and freedom to gather audiences, when it was known that they had fundamentalist tendencies and links with terrorist organisations? Is it our policy in Britain to say 'welcome to Britain and feel free to hate our society and way of life?'
It would be wrong to withdraw many of our fundamental human rights such as freedom of speech because we are scared of what people might say ? but surely when there is evidence that people have gone beyond what are acceptable societal boundaries then they need to be restrained in one way or another. Is this not what the new anti-terrorism provisions are seeking to do? Finding a way of tackling fundamentalism without resorting to fascism is going to require some common-sense in terms of interpreting the law.
Nobody wants to see a repeat of the shooting of the innocent Brazilian on the underground system, but neither do people want to encounter suicide bombers. For years there have been critical news reports on Isreali soldiers shooting Palestinians who they believed to be suicide bombers, many of whom may have been innocent, as well as reports of suicide bombers blowing themselves up in buses and bars ? now the reality of this is hitting Britain. There is no way to stop a suicide bomber but to kill them before they detonate themselves. Equally, there is no way of being absolutely sure that somebody is a suicide bomber until they actually detonate themselves. There lies the Catch 22 which will dominate the British legal system for years to come. Here we believe that someone is innocent until proven guilty, but by the time a suicide bomber is proven guilty it is too late.
So where does this leave us? If we can identify the underlying factions that are stirring up fundamentalist ideals, is it not common-sense that we either imprison or deport them? Even the Muslim Council of Great Britain supports such moves. However, we need to make sure that the extremists don't win by lulling us into a fascist state out of fear, and hence we become what they are propagating we already are. It will be common-sense that wins, not fascism, but it needs to be applied through the judicial system, not just in Government.
Eddie Blass is a freelance academic and ghostwriter specialising in business & management, futures, legal, and educational issues.
best cleaning company Highland Park ..A few hours ago, Colonel Ely Ould Mohamed Vall, the... Read More
We are having a problem in America with Public Notaries,... Read More
MUD ? Much Unnecessary DisclosureThe Federal Trade Commission recently asserted... Read More
A coffee shop conversation about a Great Country in Historic... Read More
The United States has enemies, which call the country the... Read More
Believe it or not, every theatre, church, or Britney Spears... Read More
Excess capacity occurs in many industries, such as power, electricity,... Read More
-The Protocol plan 'will remain invisible until the moment when... Read More
In the future when we decide to help nations vote... Read More
This is the fourth and final article in a series... Read More
Will a bus running across the borders bring cordial relations... Read More
The American Dream is the promise to have it all... Read More
Well having studying the need for decreasing America's dependence on... Read More
Many times our government regulatory over embellish problems in the... Read More
Where are all the high-speed trains we were promised? Where... Read More
Let's make one thing clear: This Dan Nelson Automotive fiasco... Read More
..."history may judge us to be the real bully if,... Read More
I propose a special Projection Device code-named: "TIPED". This system... Read More
As the death toll in the avalanche-hit Jammu and Kashmir... Read More
Year Item Price Rate of Inflation 03/80 Gasoline (per gallon)... Read More
Recently on C-SPAN, there were two gentlemen debating free trade... Read More
Telemarketing and DO NOT CALL lists sure made headlines, but... Read More
In the fields of juvenile justice policy and programming, there... Read More
News is spreading of the retirement of Supreme Court Justice... Read More
Do you find it interesting that people complain about the... Read More
high-end home cleaning Winnetka ..Clint Eastwood recently plunged into the murky political pond with... Read More
Well, another election has come and gone in the US... Read More
The current field of political sciences is dominated by a... Read More
Thought of the day; Questions about the judicial system. If... Read More
I would like to discuss a few issues we have... Read More
This brings to our consciousness, issues concerning the ever rising... Read More
There is a connection between economic growth and unemployment. There... Read More
The shouting is over and directions for the next four... Read More
In the future when we decide to help nations vote... Read More
The Presidents Before Washington:From the moment that the first Declaration... Read More
Submiting the Criminals to The ICC!Everybody concerns about justice in... Read More
In this day and age of tattletale, whistleblower heroes and... Read More
In many reports we see that the Federal Trade Commission... Read More
Are you happy with all this so-called security after 9-11?... Read More
In Police Magazine I read a great article about transient... Read More
Nothing could be more alarming for Americans than what I... Read More
With gasoline prices at the pump climbing strongly into the... Read More
Rush is right! The government's stepped up bid to regulate... Read More
Roberto Calvo Macias, a young author and thinker from Spain,... Read More
Policemen in many US cities are taking their new authority... Read More
We need more oversight and transparency in government. We need... Read More
For more than a decade, you the American taxpayer have... Read More
Many non-profit groups are feeling upset that they are allowed... Read More
User BaseThe non-US and non-English Web segments have been boosted... Read More
Well the title is absolute Bull Crap, but this article... Read More
Political |