Is the only way to fight Fundamentalist Extremists becoming one yourself? Having grown up in a liberal democracy, being educated in the ideals of freedom of speech and expression, diversity, multi-culturalism and the political correctness that stems from such a comprehensive education, I find myself questioning whether I am a closet fascist when it comes to the way in which the British Judiciary are referring to the whole issue surrounding the London suicide bombers of 7 July and the related legal news stories stemming from this.
I cannot understand the logic of the British Judiciary in countering the British Government's call for the expulsion of a number of foreign nationals specifically identified as contributing to anti-British feeling amongst the Muslim community. For example, one of the people due for expulsion is Abu Qatada, a Jordanian who has been tried and convicted in his absence in Jordanian courts for terrorism and given a life sentence. He is known as Osama bin Laden's 'Ambassador in Europe'. Now he is concerned that if he is returned to Jordan he will face the death sentence. The question becomes one of whether we can expel someone from Britain to what may be their death? While we don't know the details of his Jordanian convictions, terrorism in the Middle East tends to be pretty deadly, so it is fair to suspect this person has been convicted of something relating to people being killed.
This is where liberal ideals and common-sense conflict ? while we may agree in Human Rights Law, is it so wrong if we don't care that this man is being sent back to what might be his death? When someone commits themselves to terrorism, do they give up their right to justice when they so blatantly abuse it? How can we allow someone to rely on Human Rights law when they have so obviously overlooked the human rights of everyone else in the country? On a more local level, why do we have someone at liberty in Britain who has been convicted of terrorism in another country? Why were they being granted freedom of speech, and freedom to gather audiences, when it was known that they had fundamentalist tendencies and links with terrorist organisations? Is it our policy in Britain to say 'welcome to Britain and feel free to hate our society and way of life?'
It would be wrong to withdraw many of our fundamental human rights such as freedom of speech because we are scared of what people might say ? but surely when there is evidence that people have gone beyond what are acceptable societal boundaries then they need to be restrained in one way or another. Is this not what the new anti-terrorism provisions are seeking to do? Finding a way of tackling fundamentalism without resorting to fascism is going to require some common-sense in terms of interpreting the law.
Nobody wants to see a repeat of the shooting of the innocent Brazilian on the underground system, but neither do people want to encounter suicide bombers. For years there have been critical news reports on Isreali soldiers shooting Palestinians who they believed to be suicide bombers, many of whom may have been innocent, as well as reports of suicide bombers blowing themselves up in buses and bars ? now the reality of this is hitting Britain. There is no way to stop a suicide bomber but to kill them before they detonate themselves. Equally, there is no way of being absolutely sure that somebody is a suicide bomber until they actually detonate themselves. There lies the Catch 22 which will dominate the British legal system for years to come. Here we believe that someone is innocent until proven guilty, but by the time a suicide bomber is proven guilty it is too late.
So where does this leave us? If we can identify the underlying factions that are stirring up fundamentalist ideals, is it not common-sense that we either imprison or deport them? Even the Muslim Council of Great Britain supports such moves. However, we need to make sure that the extremists don't win by lulling us into a fascist state out of fear, and hence we become what they are propagating we already are. It will be common-sense that wins, not fascism, but it needs to be applied through the judicial system, not just in Government.
Eddie Blass is a freelance academic and ghostwriter specialising in business & management, futures, legal, and educational issues.
experienced cleaning professionals Winnetka ...The great people of the United States of America deserve... Read More
Here are some miscellaneous thoughts on issues many of which... Read More
Presently Universities and Private Enterprise are working to build more... Read More
America must implement a policy on Election Reform that is... Read More
The Federal Trade Commission in their latest move to increase... Read More
The Right's defense of John Thune in the Dan Nelson/MetaBank... Read More
I hear it all the time; you can't say that.... Read More
A governing.com report blast one of the major grassroots initiatives... Read More
As we reel from the news of the recent bombings... Read More
Economy is called the dismal science because it pretends to... Read More
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Was created on July 30th 2002, by... Read More
"The only time I open my mouth is when I... Read More
I would like to pose a question. I am unsure... Read More
It is a law that we register deadly weapons with... Read More
If slavery has not worked well, then cloning if it... Read More
Do you find it interesting that people complain about the... Read More
The United States and other first world nations have been... Read More
Are you happy with all this so-called security after 9-11?... Read More
The recent first round of the Iranian elections somewhat resembled... Read More
Expected new applications for Mexican trucks to enter the US... Read More
Is it just me or are you concerned that illegal... Read More
All government regulators or diplomat who are in high risk... Read More
INTRODUCTIONThe aim of writing this article is to encourage the... Read More
Einstein when ask how did he believe WWIII would be... Read More
In what the Americans love to describe as the war... Read More
pet-friendly home cleaners Bannockburn ...This is a thought on the study of Home and... Read More
After 9-11 insurance rates on Independent Truck Drivers and smaller... Read More
I would like to discuss a few issues we have... Read More
Incompetence is all too obvious at the trade shows of... Read More
The clause (c) of Electronic Crime Act 2004 has been... Read More
In the most rewarding new industries, there is often a... Read More
A Governmental commission, headed personally by the Prime Minister has... Read More
An irresponsible Chinese General made a very telling comment recently.... Read More
One of my favourite pieces of music is the Sex... Read More
According to a postulate made by Ignacio Ramonet ecological resources... Read More
Since the court case was over turned against Arthur Anderson... Read More
The evacuation of Gaza is now completed, and the world... Read More
As you can see from some of our previous articles,... Read More
A friend of mine, who lives in the thick of... Read More
I just got done reading a series of articles dating... Read More
When Pennsylvania Senator Arlen Spector exercised his right to free... Read More
In this day and age of tattletale, whistleblower heroes and... Read More
I always have to remember to take a deep breath... Read More
Maybe some of the people complaining ought to go to... Read More
As more and more cities and states set up websites... Read More
Our government is set up like a modern day franchise.... Read More
The Carl Rove issue is definitely interesting and distracting. The... Read More
The Bill of Rights to our Constitution caused -- and... Read More
The shouting is over and directions for the next four... Read More
Farmers will eventually be facing federal regulations involving air emissions... Read More
Political |