Is the only way to fight Fundamentalist Extremists becoming one yourself? Having grown up in a liberal democracy, being educated in the ideals of freedom of speech and expression, diversity, multi-culturalism and the political correctness that stems from such a comprehensive education, I find myself questioning whether I am a closet fascist when it comes to the way in which the British Judiciary are referring to the whole issue surrounding the London suicide bombers of 7 July and the related legal news stories stemming from this.
I cannot understand the logic of the British Judiciary in countering the British Government's call for the expulsion of a number of foreign nationals specifically identified as contributing to anti-British feeling amongst the Muslim community. For example, one of the people due for expulsion is Abu Qatada, a Jordanian who has been tried and convicted in his absence in Jordanian courts for terrorism and given a life sentence. He is known as Osama bin Laden's 'Ambassador in Europe'. Now he is concerned that if he is returned to Jordan he will face the death sentence. The question becomes one of whether we can expel someone from Britain to what may be their death? While we don't know the details of his Jordanian convictions, terrorism in the Middle East tends to be pretty deadly, so it is fair to suspect this person has been convicted of something relating to people being killed.
This is where liberal ideals and common-sense conflict ? while we may agree in Human Rights Law, is it so wrong if we don't care that this man is being sent back to what might be his death? When someone commits themselves to terrorism, do they give up their right to justice when they so blatantly abuse it? How can we allow someone to rely on Human Rights law when they have so obviously overlooked the human rights of everyone else in the country? On a more local level, why do we have someone at liberty in Britain who has been convicted of terrorism in another country? Why were they being granted freedom of speech, and freedom to gather audiences, when it was known that they had fundamentalist tendencies and links with terrorist organisations? Is it our policy in Britain to say 'welcome to Britain and feel free to hate our society and way of life?'
It would be wrong to withdraw many of our fundamental human rights such as freedom of speech because we are scared of what people might say ? but surely when there is evidence that people have gone beyond what are acceptable societal boundaries then they need to be restrained in one way or another. Is this not what the new anti-terrorism provisions are seeking to do? Finding a way of tackling fundamentalism without resorting to fascism is going to require some common-sense in terms of interpreting the law.
Nobody wants to see a repeat of the shooting of the innocent Brazilian on the underground system, but neither do people want to encounter suicide bombers. For years there have been critical news reports on Isreali soldiers shooting Palestinians who they believed to be suicide bombers, many of whom may have been innocent, as well as reports of suicide bombers blowing themselves up in buses and bars ? now the reality of this is hitting Britain. There is no way to stop a suicide bomber but to kill them before they detonate themselves. Equally, there is no way of being absolutely sure that somebody is a suicide bomber until they actually detonate themselves. There lies the Catch 22 which will dominate the British legal system for years to come. Here we believe that someone is innocent until proven guilty, but by the time a suicide bomber is proven guilty it is too late.
So where does this leave us? If we can identify the underlying factions that are stirring up fundamentalist ideals, is it not common-sense that we either imprison or deport them? Even the Muslim Council of Great Britain supports such moves. However, we need to make sure that the extremists don't win by lulling us into a fascist state out of fear, and hence we become what they are propagating we already are. It will be common-sense that wins, not fascism, but it needs to be applied through the judicial system, not just in Government.
Eddie Blass is a freelance academic and ghostwriter specialising in business & management, futures, legal, and educational issues.
move in cleaning service Mundelein ..User BaseThe non-US and non-English Web segments have been boosted... Read More
When you look at the news, immigrants are dying trying... Read More
Recently the Los Angeles Transit workers are on Strike and... Read More
When you see hooded Klansmen walking up Pennsylvania Avenue to... Read More
September 11, 2001 could have been prevented. We could have... Read More
One question not addressed in GM Crops and Monsanto Terminator... Read More
The second amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees every American... Read More
Fifteen hours is a tremendous barrier. It is the obstacle... Read More
We presently have adequate sniffer devices in this country to... Read More
For a short time I worked as a union officer... Read More
The Carl Rove issue is definitely interesting and distracting. The... Read More
IntroductionThe way one lyrist has written, "Hum logo ko samajh... Read More
The evacuation of Gaza is now completed, and the world... Read More
Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, has... Read More
It is time for a change. A change in philosophy,... Read More
Tulipmania - this is the name coined for the first... Read More
The Federal trade Commission has a rule, which says that... Read More
The shouting is over and directions for the next four... Read More
The recent Jakarta summit of Asia and Africa brought remembrance... Read More
What ordinary people are saying about U.S. televangelist Pat Robertson... Read More
The current field of political sciences is dominated by a... Read More
30 years ago, California, later followed by other states, decided... Read More
Question: Dr. Vaknin ? is it true that you are... Read More
Revitalization Downtown projects are all the rage in fact the... Read More
Close to 500,000 people - one in four - live... Read More
insured cleaning company Highland Park ..Is it just me or are you concerned that illegal... Read More
The idea is to have all the important items with... Read More
Dust from Deserts and Particulate ControlThe greatest contributor to particulate... Read More
I. WARS ARE BASIC CONFLICTS OVER LAND. II. BOUNDARIES. THE... Read More
Each day the present geo-political reality confirms what The Tribulation... Read More
Entrepreneurs can clean up the environment if we would let... Read More
As more and more cities and states set up websites... Read More
WE MUST PUT A STOP TO THE EVER-INCREASING PRICE OF... Read More
The head of the Club of Rome has said that... Read More
The United States is losing its industrial capacity quite rapidly.... Read More
Amnesty International comments on the proposal that has been laid... Read More
Forest Vegetation Simulations for Fire Prevention, Healthy Forest and Saving... Read More
Land Mines have been one of the most evil left... Read More
Rufus King: (Said to be the fifth most important person... Read More
President Bush's selection of the Hon. John Roberts is an... Read More
Why is it that every single thing government does; it... Read More
Our Airports have excess capacity, which is not being used... Read More
Elliot Spitzer, recently said he wanted to drive a stake... Read More
I like Bill O'Reilly. I do. I have read two... Read More
Most citizens agree that we need the Federal Trade Commission... Read More
Non-lethal Goo Concepts have been tossed around by many war... Read More
Fearful that terrorists will next target Australia, Prime Minister John... Read More
Thomas Jefferson wrote a letter to Lafayette in 1823 that... Read More
When North Americans discuss Cuba, they always focus the intense... Read More
Pierre Dupont de Nemours:After arranging the Armistice that ended or... Read More
Political |