Clint Eastwood recently plunged into the murky political pond with his statement, "Extremism is so easy. You've got your position, and that's it. It doesn't take much thought. And when you go far enough to the right, you meet the same idiots coming around from the left."
Is it easy to be an extremist, and is the political scale truly circular, so that the "far right" clasps hands with the "far left"? Does the left-right continuum serve as a constructive paradigm upon which society can be structured?
Today's "extremists" are in good company: Jesus, Martin Luther, Abraham Lincoln, Thomas Jefferson, and Baruch Spinoza all bore this label at one time. Jan De Witt and his brother Cornelius-17th Century Dutch politicians-were hacked to death by the populace, largely due to their "radical" and "unsavory" political perspective. Their crime? They were proponents of democracy. Their body parts were displayed in storefronts all over town.
Who shall we call extreme? The vigilantes who did the lynching? The shopkeepers who showcased the body parts? Or the De Witts with their pro-democracy stance?
Do "extreme" beliefs emanate from a mechanical thought process, as Eastwood suggests, rather than an intense philosophical journey? It arguably requires reflection and hypercritical analysis to defend ones theories against the cloned, echoed and mass produced opinion of the common folk; it requires conviction to risk social ostracism and other forms of retaliation.
The "approved" or popular view is more likely to be perfunctory. Why think when one can plagiarize? Why go out on a limb when one can cling onto the tree or never climb in the first place?
Eastwood may view those on the "far right" and "far left" as moralistically shrill, as manifesting a tone level of fear and anger. Perhaps this is how the "right" and "left" overlap or come full circle in his mind. But this is a gross generalization, since the "extremes" are subjective and the political continuum fallacious.
Suppose we accept the commonly accepted paradigm of a left to right political continuum, as Eastwood offers. If we define the "left" as the group that protects the voiceless, the powerless, and the forgotten, then the natural progression would be to protect the truly voiceless ? animals and nature.
Nonhumans are excluded from our political system, without representation. They have no standing in court; yet corporations do. In fact, nonhumans are virtually omitted from the conversation in our anthropocentric and speciesist society.
A move "left" arguably means to move away from Democracy-?which is really just a rule by the elite (humans)-?to an Omniocracy (which I describe as a government of, by and for all living beings). The European Union has added nonhumans to their Constitution, as have Switzerland and Germany. New Zealand, India and Reggio Emilio, Italy have outlawed using animals in ways we normally think acceptable in the U.S. (boiling lobsters alive, keeping fish in small bowls, vivisection, etc.).
We are trailing behind other nations, but it would be difficult to sell a Constitutional amendment to our "What's the Matter With Kansas?" country at this time. It would be easier to convince certain states. You may be thinking what would stuffing a few extra words in a state Constitution really do. Well, words are a powerful tool and an important start.
Lastly, does this move to the left spit us out on right? Probably. One could argue that traditional "right" politics prompts a gap between the rich and poor, thus culminates in the rule by a few, such as corporations. To implement policies that foster the idea that nonhuman species have value "in and of themselves," a "top down" government or rule by a few (although not corporations) again seems required.
People are self-interested (as are all species) thus cannot be expected to vote against their desires. Legislators, however, are different (or should be) because they attain self-worth from helping others, being fair and inclusive, and consulting the "big picture." There will naturally be conflicts of interest between species and individuals; but government's job-in an omniocracy as in our current system-- will be to mediate and arbitrate these "disputes."
We are taught democracy is the most inclusive, just and beneficent political system in the world. It is time to re-evaluate. Successful ideas advance through three stages: first ridicule, then discussion, finally adoption. I say we begin the discussion to which Eastwood's words have provided a starting point.
The Clint Eastwood quote is posted on oakland mayor jerry brown's blog and is taken from Feb 28, 2005 issue of Time Magazine. Charlotte Laws explores this topic in greater depth on the blog.
Charlotte Laws, Ph.D. is a member of the Greater Valley Glen Council and the President of the League for Earth and Animal Protection (LEAP). Her website is oakland mayor jerry brown's blog
Culver prom limo ..With people living longer we have some problems as those... Read More
THE ECCLESIASTICAL GRANT:There are good things done by the hegemony.... Read More
Forest Vegetation Simulations for Fire Prevention, Healthy Forest and Saving... Read More
As baby boomers, we have been spoiled all of our... Read More
With elections on the horizon and Blair looking tired and... Read More
Heaven, Hell, or some sort of Purgatory.I cannot seem to... Read More
OH MAN!Here we go again. I guess now the "proof... Read More
Due to the bizarre weather patterns this winter California got... Read More
Often we see protests at the sites of global leader... Read More
China maybe stopping some of the SPAM coming into the... Read More
Where are all the high-speed trains we were promised? Where... Read More
The RSS is getting feedback from its 140 pracharaks or... Read More
I had the benefit of getting an interview with Mr.... Read More
Hello! Happy new year. May you live a long healthy... Read More
I am noticing an increasing and alarming rate to which... Read More
The United States is losing its industrial capacity quite rapidly.... Read More
The United States and other first world nations have been... Read More
(1) Each person is to have an equal right to... Read More
Businesses advertising alcohol either in TV or non-broadcast format need... Read More
Bill Cosby got it wrong. His many speeches regarding the... Read More
I was dismayed to learn the other day, that my... Read More
All government regulators or diplomat who are in high risk... Read More
A governing.com report blast one of the major grassroots initiatives... Read More
I've been thinking again. I know some of my readers... Read More
If we go hog wild towards the liberal agenda where... Read More
Wood Dale limo ..An interesting conversation that I thought I must share with... Read More
In the future when we decide to help nations vote... Read More
UNAUTHORIZED HACKINGThe term "computer hacking" traditionally describes the penetration into... Read More
Down The Bush and BlairBy now everyone, except us, is... Read More
In what the Americans love to describe as the war... Read More
The official figures are staggering: 35% of the workforce -... Read More
Many people make a lot of money in war. In... Read More
Our government is set up like a modern day franchise.... Read More
The current political efforts aimed at improving the American public... Read More
The People's Liberation Army of China invaded Tibet in 1949.... Read More
Many times our government regulatory over embellish problems in the... Read More
Let the reader be reminded, that this document we are... Read More
There is no doubt in hindsight that Sarbanes Oxley was... Read More
The most damaging factor to our economy today is the... Read More
The head of the Club of Rome has said that... Read More
PolicyFederal Fair Housing accessibility requirements for new multifamily buildings should... Read More
SYNOD OF DRUM CEATT (494 - 5):It is interesting to... Read More
If someone wanted to farm future clones they would need... Read More
A quick look back at NAFTA; how did we do?Stabilizing... Read More
Let's put the religious part of the debate for a... Read More
Recently the CIA staged a practice simulation of a cyber... Read More
The Right's defense of John Thune in the Dan Nelson/MetaBank... Read More
Utah introduced a bill designed to limit the use of... Read More
For a short time I worked as a union officer... Read More
Water Conservation in larger cities is less of an issue... Read More
Political |