[Author's Note: Another essay that I wrote on notebook paper during boring school hours. This wonderful little piece was starting in boring English class on Tuesday, November 26, 2002, and continued into Art class. It was finished in school on Tuesday, December 2, 2002, when I finished it in English class. I worked on it in no other class, and finished it within a few classes. Hooray for high school.]
The Beginning
If a group of people were to live on an island, who would govern who, how, and why? If person A suspected person B of possessing a deadly weapon (if this were a crime), then how could we justify person A searching person B? Whatever reason offered for justification of search and seizure, it aso justifies person B searching person A. On this island, who would be the government? Who would rule? Whatever can justify the rule of person A can also justify the rule of person B. If one person is elected on the island, through some sort of Republic process, how is he justified in passing and enforcing laws? If an elected ruler passes a law that anyone to wear a hat is killed, would it not be equally justified for one dissident to make their own government, passing legislation that wearing hats is acceptable?
A government may be defined as a person or a persons trying to enforce a rule or regulation. And if one government can be formed by one person, with legislation passed that possessing head fashion is illegal, so another one is not more wrong in making it legal.
By what right would one government have the right to tell one person to do, any more than the one person would have the right to tell what the government to do? Is there anything intrinsically distinctive of either the individual or the government that allows one to control the other without restraint? If this individual opposed the state's regulation as much as the state opposed the individual's actions, how is one more justified in controlling the other? There can be no appeal to one being intrinsically right and one being intrinsically wrong: there have been just as many bad governments as there have been bad rebels. So, if a party of people lived on an island, who would govern who, and how could it possibly be justified?
Take into consideration the lack of justification for government to rule anyone on this island, as for the United States to rule anyone on this land. Just as a government on the island can oppose an individual's actions, so does our United States government oppose some of our actions, as they carry out their regulation. Use of Marijuana, a harmless practice, has been banned by the state. By what writ can the government jail Marijuana users, any more than Marijuana users can enforce their own regulation allowing Marijuana? If a police officer is justified in arresting members of society who do no harm but just commit a crime, then a citizen must be justified in arresting the government equally. There is no divine mandate given to anyone to rule, control, and kill others, be it any populace member or any government.
The similarities between the hypothetical island scenario and the United States government are undeniable. The United States government has no right to rule me any more than I have a right to rule those people who make up the government. Nor ar they justified in any of their legislation, and enforcing their legislation, whether it is outlawing murder, wearing hats, or believing what you want. The government has no right to pass such laws any more than I have the right to pass such laws.
The Middle
The Republic is a type of government where the people vote for one person to rule all. This varies from other types of governments where, more or less, a ruler maintains their power. By maintaining power, I do not mean by campaigning, but rather by an army theratening the populace. Such a ruler may be known as a dictator or a monarch. However, there are some who stipulate that a king's rule is tryanny to the rule of an elected official. What can there be, honestly, to separate the rule of a dictator and the rule of an elected official? Historically, both are prone to commit the most atrocious acts, often defending themselves with the idea that they are defending their land.
Furthermore, both presidents and kings have accepted bribery and corruption. What can there be to separate a Dictatorship and a Republic? It still gives one person, out of thousands, possibly millions, it gives this one person control over the rest of the populace. And whether or not a Constitution exists in this Monarchy or Republic, kings and presidents have both trampled them to pieces in the wake of their search for power and wealth. There is one solitary difference between a dictator and a president: one is elected, one is not. The similarities between these two, though, is endless: their cruel search for power, the history of their relentlessness in eliminating enemies, they rule a population without restrain or control, save the remnants of their conscience.
The United States' administration differs from that of a Latin Dictatorship in one way: how they are chosen. The United States goes through the process of election where we choose our president, but even this failed, as the majority voted against the president who seized power. If there is any proof of corruption of power, of how a president is nothing more than a dictator, then let it be this: our current president was voted against by the people, but he rules us anyway. His laws control our bodies, even though we did not choose him. George W. Bush is not in power because he was elected. He is in power because of his army, because of his secret, underground spy network which keeps tabs on +300 million American suspects. The difference between a Republic and a Dictatorship is election, but both governments give unfair power to one person to rule all people, and both are productive of heartless, cruel atrocities.
The Ending
By what right does a police officer have to detain me, anymore than I have the right to detain the police officer? How isa president more qualified to rule a populace than a dictator? Why is it so impossible to imagine a society that rules itself, with Direct Democracy, and no leaders or police officers?
For Life,
Punkerslut
http://www.punkerslut.com
Punkerslut (or Andy Carloff) has been writing essays and poetry on social issues which have caught his attention for several years. His website http://www.punkerslut.com provides a complete list of all of these writings.
scheduled cleaning services Bannockburn ...North Korea and diplomatic games; something has to give and... Read More
President George W. Bush has unofficially won his re-election bid... Read More
There are no stupid questions, only stupid people. Ask an... Read More
In today's Rants from Lance session I address the question... Read More
INTRODUCTIONThe aim of writing this article is to encourage the... Read More
WE MUST PUT A STOP TO THE EVER-INCREASING PRICE OF... Read More
There's a new Michigan state register (at https://www.protectmichild.com/) in the... Read More
The partisan feuding in the U.S. Senate over federal judicial... Read More
Predicting the future is a tricky business. There have been... Read More
UK Water RatesYOU CANNOT BE DISCONNECTED FOR WATER RATES DEBTSWater... Read More
We need a government that can be as responsive to... Read More
The most damaging factor to our economy today is the... Read More
Heavens, what are we up against? It seems these days... Read More
Those who are above the law or act as such... Read More
Businesses advertising alcohol either in TV or non-broadcast format need... Read More
Do you really want to get ahead in your life?... Read More
Well many have complained that the FBI and CIA dropped... Read More
What has really changed in the housing market with regards... Read More
Up until the final debate at Arizona State University, the... Read More
The offshore financial centres have been forced in recent years... Read More
Conventional warfare is getting to its limits. Soon wars will... Read More
The Right's defense of John Thune in the Dan Nelson/MetaBank... Read More
Having redundancies and today's technologies in transportation we have protected... Read More
The FTC franchising division purports their law enforcement experience in... Read More
Excess capacity occurs in many industries, such as power, electricity,... Read More
full-service cleaning Park Ridge ...This brings to our consciousness, issues concerning the ever rising... Read More
There is a connection between economic growth and unemployment. There... Read More
Sodomy is against the law, yet goes on every day... Read More
For years we've suffered under recession, prompting us to ask,... Read More
The problem of poverty in America comes as a surprise.... Read More
The prosecutors in the Martha Stewart Case used testimony from... Read More
The recent first round of the Iranian elections somewhat resembled... Read More
Currently the United States has weapons, which can shoot around... Read More
IT'S NO LONGER NEWS THAT CHINA IS BECOMING A MAJOR... Read More
As you know Delta Airlines is close to bankruptcy. Their... Read More
I. The FactsJust days before a much-awaited donor conference, the... Read More
As the populations expand in Colorado outside of Denver, Las... Read More
The devastating loss in case of Elliot Spitzer for NY... Read More
You have in front of you two buttons, one is... Read More
Britain has a proud tradition of valiant armed forces and... Read More
30 years ago, California, later followed by other states, decided... Read More
THE ROSICRUCIAN COUNCIL OF THREE:A Thelema/OTO leader who became a... Read More
In the most rewarding new industries, there is often a... Read More
"Rugged individualism" is actually a euphemism for Thomas Hobbes' baseless... Read More
Many Americans feel betrayed by their government, our government. I... Read More
(Note: This article was written slightly before the 2004 election;... Read More
The United States and other first world nations have been... Read More
Conor MacDari was a Mason but his Masonry deplored the... Read More
This is no time for the Black community to sue... Read More
Handing over power to Vladimir Putin in 1999, Boris Yeltsin... Read More
Political |