When I was growing up, I actually considered a career in politics. I quickly changed my mind, though, when I discovered that there was way too much politics involved in it. Obviously, that's a play on words, but I get funny looks from people when I tell them that. However, I am completely serious. The politics of running for and holding elective office is influenced too much by the politics of power, influence, and money. But whose fault is it that such a condition exists? I believe voters have no one to blame but themselves.
As a voting public, we have become entirely too sophisticated for our own good. Many of us have made a habit of voting pragmatically, i.e., voting for the person we think has the best chance to win instead of the person we most agree with. We complain about wishy-washy politicians who won't give us straight answers, yet when people who say what they really think run for office, we dismiss them as being "loose cannons." When any candidate makes a statement that's evenly slightly out of the mainstream, it is considered such an egregious act that he or she either becomes marginalized or is forced to drop out of the race. What's left is a bunch of cautious and robotic weenies with their fingers in the wind - people who form their decisions based on polls and focus groups.
We say we want candidates who are different, but not too different. We say we want new ideas but we shun candidates that seem the least bit precocious. Therefore, we end up with the kinds of candidates we've always had.
I've often heard voters comment on candidates by making statements like "I couldn't imagine her being elected" or "he sends shivers down my spine." Most people will automatically exclude any candidate who would fit those kinds of descriptions. But should they? Sometimes good candidates come in packages that might be a little different or even a bit scary. By disqualifying those types of candidates, we could be missing out on some potentially great leaders. I wonder how many of today's sophisticated voters would consider someone like Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, or Teddy Roosevelt too much of a "nut" to be elected.
We like to say the issues are the important things to us. However, many of us vote based on personalities. For example, we will decide on a presidential candidate based on who seems the most "presidential" (whatever that means). We are also too concerned about meaningless ceremonial issues. For example, I bet some people wouldn't vote for an unmarried man for president because of their concern about the absence of a first lady. We also put too great of an emphasis on superficial issues such as aesthetics, i.e., how someone looks. Richard Nixon may have lost the 1960 election because he didn't look as good on TV as John F. Kennedy during their debate.
We also stress a candidate's education a little too much. Education is important, but it's not everything. Some of smartest people in the world never attended college. However, many of us wouldn't consider someone for any office higher than dog catcher unless he or she had at least a Bachelor's degree.
Many voters make their ballot selections based on personal greed instead of what's best for their country, state, district, or locality. They will reserve their votes for politicians whom they think will give them things and/or make life easier for them. Of course, Politicians constantly exploit this greed by making outlandish promises. Once these politicians are elected, they either have to renege on those promises or create budget deficits in order to bring them about.
Other voters, while not so much motivated by personal greed, will vote based on localized interests at the expense of the more general interests. For example, they might vote for a particular congressional candidate because they think he will bring a lot of goodies to their district. This mentality also helps to forge a cycle of promises, broken promises, and budget deficits. Until voters begin to put the general good ahead of personal and parochial interests, these problems will persist.
We like to blame the news media for all of the "gotcha" political stories that pry too deeply into the personal lives and distant past history of candidates and therefore keep many good and qualified people out the political arena. However, it is ultimately our fault because we eat that stuff up. We can't get enough of it. The more dirt the news outlets dig up on various candidates, the more we buy their newspapers and tune in to their TV and radio stations for more of those stories. The sad part is that we allow that stuff to influence our votes. Most of it is irrelevant to the issues at hand and should not be taken seriously by voters. We do usually ignore the parts about the candidates or parties we like, but we tend to believe the parts about the candidates or parties we don't like. Therefore, the news media keeps feeding us this garbage.
Last but not least, one of our biggest problems is our unwillingness to vote for independent or third party candidates. These candidates generally do not have obligations to party bosses or quid pro quo relationships with lobbyists like the major party candidates do. Very often, we will vote for the lesser of two evils, rather than an independent or third party candidate who might be much better. Of course, when you vote for the lesser of two evils, you're still voting for an evil. Many people feel like they would be wasting their vote by voting for any of those other candidates. This is simply not true. A voter only wastes his/her vote when he/she votes for someone he/she does not really like. Instead, we create a voting catch-22 for ourselves, i.e., no one will vote for Mr. Independent because he has no chance; Mr. Independent has no chance because no one will vote for him. If enough people decided to start voting their conscience, we could break that vicious cycle.
Terry Mitchell is a software engineer, freelance writer, and trivia buff from Hopewell, VA. He also serves as a political columnist for American Daily and operates his own website - http://www.commenterry.com - on which he posts commentaries on various subjects such as politics, technology, religion, health and well-being, personal finance, and sports. His commentaries offer a unique point of view that is not often found in mainstream media.
luxury cleaning services Bannockburn ...This is a thought on the study of Home and... Read More
Aren't you glad you purchased Alaska? You got a bargain,... Read More
Societies have always had a problem of what to do... Read More
"Like humans void of soul or mind, they jeered and... Read More
When this president's father was in the Oval Office, he... Read More
It is important as populations expand to work on the... Read More
If slavery has not worked well, then cloning if it... Read More
Thought of the day; Questions about the judicial system. If... Read More
A few hours ago, Colonel Ely Ould Mohamed Vall, the... Read More
The furore in the BJP camp in India, triggered by... Read More
IntroductionThe way one lyrist has written, "Hum logo ko samajh... Read More
From the National Association of Realtors' Virtual Office Website policy,... Read More
The US Homeland Security is worried about Hydrofoil or Skimmer... Read More
The most exciting event in Slovenia last week was when... Read More
As the populations expand in Colorado outside of Denver, Las... Read More
I hope to provide a starting point for the serious... Read More
Here are some miscellaneous thoughts on issues many of which... Read More
There is debate about the methodology of forestry and also... Read More
Streamlining Homeland Security with a Free market flair? An idea... Read More
I'm starting to feel squeezed by all the political correctness... Read More
It is amazing how the Federal Trade Commission has destroyed... Read More
Prison guards and corrections professionals are hard at work insuring... Read More
The Randolphs:Peyton Randolph was the first President of the United... Read More
You, the reader, should be aware of my affluence of... Read More
The City of Portland is going after any small business,... Read More
professional maid services Mundelein ...I heard on the news this week how America continues... Read More
Streamlining Homeland Security with a Free market flair? An idea... Read More
Aspartame activists are constantly being attacked because all data are... Read More
The cause of America is in a great measure the... Read More
So you are ready to run for public office are... Read More
I have witnessed a new era of security in the... Read More
The American Dream is the promise to have it all... Read More
I like Bill O'Reilly. I do. I have read two... Read More
Political strategists, branding gurus and image consultants could learn a... Read More
The expertise and advancement of the evolution of man and... Read More
For the business community 9-11 changed everything. In our company,... Read More
Do you ever wonder how everything gets to the super... Read More
Lecture given at the Netherlands Economic Institute (NEI) on 18/4/2001Human... Read More
Tulipmania - this is the name coined for the first... Read More
Americans pride themselves on being the best, that's a fact.... Read More
A. THE PHILOSOPHY OF COMPETITIONThe aims of competition (anti-trust) laws... Read More
Conor MacDari was a Mason but his Masonry deplored the... Read More
Those who are above the law or act as such... Read More
You know we have sent many, many army tanks with... Read More
There are many mines around the world, which are owned... Read More
Nothing could be more alarming for Americans than what I... Read More
Many have lost faith in the government and are completely... Read More
Pierre Dupont de Nemours:After arranging the Armistice that ended or... Read More
Publicity is correlative to your position in the community. Seldom... Read More
In years past California Mutual Assistance Program and emergency response... Read More
Political |