I always have to remember to take a deep breath when examining the laws being proposed by our grand Legislature. I detest most of the new legislation on the table, but have to forgive our representatives in the House and Senate for it. After all, writing laws is what a Legislature does, and if they don't write enough laws, it can begin to look like they've been loafing.
Call me strange, but I rather prefer a Legislature that goofs off and under produces new laws. I'm convinced we have enough of them already, and agree with Mark Twain, who famously said that no man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the Legislature is in session.
Mainly, that is because no lawmaker wants to look like a slacker, especially so soon after an election. It's bad form. As a result, we get some hideous proposals that I would chalk up as an effort to hide behind some broad good intention while looking meaningful, or at least busy.
House Bill 1508 is a textbook case as one such proposal.
Representative Vanessa Summers, an Indianapolis Democrat, has introduced legislation that would prohibit the use of cell phones, making exceptions for hands-free devices and for emergency use. The proposed fine for violations of the law would be up to $25.
The intent is to make our streets a little less hazardous. We have all groused at the idiot guilty of driving while in conversation that cut us off or made us miss a light, and we have cursed the driver and his cell phone. Summers' proposal takes its cue from similar laws passed in New York and the District of Columbia. As everyone knows, these cities now have the safest streets in the world.
This law is rife with problems, from practical application to the higher concerns of individual liberty.
I know four friends, right off the top of my head, who would gladly pay up to $25, as a cost of doing business. They think this highly of each and every one of their calls. $25 is no kind of deterrent for these people.
What is emergency use? I define emergency use of a cell phone as a frantic call to a friend because I suddenly had two tickets offered to me for a Colts' playoff game, and I have to accept within five minutes, or the tickets will be passed on to a co-worker. My wife defines it as having found a deal on furniture, and she's on her way home so I can look at fabric swatches. I'm betting that this is not what the Representative has in mind. Some revisions will be in order.
But why just cell phones? If the real intent of the law is to eliminate distractions from our roadways, why not ban them all? Summers could justifiably expand the proposal to include a ban on smoking in the car, adjusting the radio or inserting a Britney Spears CD, eating fast food, scolding the rug rats in the backseat, talking with your spouse, shaving or applying makeup, doing the crossword puzzle, using a laptop computer, calling for on-screen directions to Starbucks, and rehearsing your excuse that explains your tardiness to the boss.
Could we really ban Britney Spears CDs? I digress.
Before the law is done with revisions, no common person will be able to read and understand it, and mainly, drivers will just continue to take their chances.
This begs the significant philosophical question: Why bother?
Isn't it sufficient that citations can already be issued if the use of a cell phone is the cause of an accident? Why pile on? No harm, no foul: If the use of a cell phone isn't endangering anyone in the moment, why penalize for the harm that was not caused?
Ah, the law is to be a deterrent, to eliminate the possibility of harm. But won't it also become more than that? How much of a stretch is it to envision police pulling over drivers who endanger nobody on a deserted road at 11pm, but who are guilty of making a cell call, just so the officer can meet his monthly quota? Isn't that a harm all its own?
Say, if the police pull a driver over to the side of the road, isn't that the sort of distraction that could cause an accident? It should be banned!
Let's hope this Bill dies in committee. If it passes, Summers will run for re-election in 2006 on the basis of having produced this wonderful law? and of having been suitably busy.
Mike Kole is chair of the Libertarian Party of Hamilton County (Noblesville) and candidate for Secretary of State (2006).
Libertarian Writers' Bureau http://www.writersbureau.org
Leave it to the Columbia City Police Officers Association in... Read More
The Carl Rove issue is definitely interesting and distracting. The... Read More
What depth of blind insanity has inflicted itself upon Israel's... Read More
Large parts of the world today suffer from a severe... Read More
The City of Portland is going after any small business,... Read More
Many believe Al-Qaida already has nukes in the United States... Read More
Prison guards and corrections professionals are hard at work insuring... Read More
Alexander Hamilton ? Policy Separated from Politics:I am related to... Read More
Regarding the de-regulation of energy, this is not such a... Read More
I would like to discuss the blocked persons list of... Read More
Few understand the Franchising Format and even fewer have correlated... Read More
Legislation is getting legs to further curtail your use of... Read More
In order to build a stronger, more self-sufficient America, America... Read More
Heavens, what are we up against? It seems these days... Read More
In Belarus parliament is going to struggle with degeneration of... Read More
With gasoline prices at the pump climbing strongly into the... Read More
I believe it would be good for the economy for... Read More
News is spreading of the retirement of Supreme Court Justice... Read More
Thought of the day; Questions about the judicial system. If... Read More
After 9-11 insurance rates on Independent Truck Drivers and smaller... Read More
Corporate America has been shaken recently by lawsuits and criminal... Read More
The UAV, Unmanned Aerial Vehicle is hear to stay and... Read More
There are many issues on the minds of US voters... Read More
Well here is a great new product, we first saw... Read More
Public utilities and a problematic issue on the allowance of... Read More
We are told by out leadership that we risk loss... Read More
I read an interesting article in foreign Affairs magazine last... Read More
In an effort to assist our political leadership it would... Read More
Freedom is in the eyes of the beholder. In Communist... Read More
Wealth Distribution is often discussed at length in periodicals such... Read More
I am not an African-American. Don't call me an African... Read More
Regarding the de-regulation of energy, this is not such a... Read More
Commission for Africa (CFA), one is made to understand is... Read More
Today we have a new franchise report from the Federal... Read More
Q. Should the Government be concerned if the CPI rises... Read More
Many people who are expert in the issue of the... Read More
Do you really want to get ahead in your life?... Read More
This is the first of a series of four articles... Read More
Mexico the country of Salsa, Tortillas and Corruption; I first... Read More
Veterans Affairs Employees using government credit cards on personal items?... Read More
Conventional warfare is getting to its limits. Soon wars will... Read More
As the populations expand in Colorado outside of Denver, Las... Read More
Revitalization Downtown projects are all the rage in fact the... Read More
The City of Portland is going after any small business,... Read More
Last year a Maryland State Legislator whom I presume never... Read More
(Note: This article was written slightly before the 2004 election;... Read More
Recently in Maine, I talked with a gentleman and we... Read More
Throughout all recorded history on our lovely little planet, Earth's... Read More
Our Hydro-electricity accounts for some 20% of our current needs.... Read More
A few hours ago, Colonel Ely Ould Mohamed Vall, the... Read More
Political |