I always have to remember to take a deep breath when examining the laws being proposed by our grand Legislature. I detest most of the new legislation on the table, but have to forgive our representatives in the House and Senate for it. After all, writing laws is what a Legislature does, and if they don't write enough laws, it can begin to look like they've been loafing.
Call me strange, but I rather prefer a Legislature that goofs off and under produces new laws. I'm convinced we have enough of them already, and agree with Mark Twain, who famously said that no man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the Legislature is in session.
Mainly, that is because no lawmaker wants to look like a slacker, especially so soon after an election. It's bad form. As a result, we get some hideous proposals that I would chalk up as an effort to hide behind some broad good intention while looking meaningful, or at least busy.
House Bill 1508 is a textbook case as one such proposal.
Representative Vanessa Summers, an Indianapolis Democrat, has introduced legislation that would prohibit the use of cell phones, making exceptions for hands-free devices and for emergency use. The proposed fine for violations of the law would be up to $25.
The intent is to make our streets a little less hazardous. We have all groused at the idiot guilty of driving while in conversation that cut us off or made us miss a light, and we have cursed the driver and his cell phone. Summers' proposal takes its cue from similar laws passed in New York and the District of Columbia. As everyone knows, these cities now have the safest streets in the world.
This law is rife with problems, from practical application to the higher concerns of individual liberty.
I know four friends, right off the top of my head, who would gladly pay up to $25, as a cost of doing business. They think this highly of each and every one of their calls. $25 is no kind of deterrent for these people.
What is emergency use? I define emergency use of a cell phone as a frantic call to a friend because I suddenly had two tickets offered to me for a Colts' playoff game, and I have to accept within five minutes, or the tickets will be passed on to a co-worker. My wife defines it as having found a deal on furniture, and she's on her way home so I can look at fabric swatches. I'm betting that this is not what the Representative has in mind. Some revisions will be in order.
But why just cell phones? If the real intent of the law is to eliminate distractions from our roadways, why not ban them all? Summers could justifiably expand the proposal to include a ban on smoking in the car, adjusting the radio or inserting a Britney Spears CD, eating fast food, scolding the rug rats in the backseat, talking with your spouse, shaving or applying makeup, doing the crossword puzzle, using a laptop computer, calling for on-screen directions to Starbucks, and rehearsing your excuse that explains your tardiness to the boss.
Could we really ban Britney Spears CDs? I digress.
Before the law is done with revisions, no common person will be able to read and understand it, and mainly, drivers will just continue to take their chances.
This begs the significant philosophical question: Why bother?
Isn't it sufficient that citations can already be issued if the use of a cell phone is the cause of an accident? Why pile on? No harm, no foul: If the use of a cell phone isn't endangering anyone in the moment, why penalize for the harm that was not caused?
Ah, the law is to be a deterrent, to eliminate the possibility of harm. But won't it also become more than that? How much of a stretch is it to envision police pulling over drivers who endanger nobody on a deserted road at 11pm, but who are guilty of making a cell call, just so the officer can meet his monthly quota? Isn't that a harm all its own?
Say, if the police pull a driver over to the side of the road, isn't that the sort of distraction that could cause an accident? It should be banned!
Let's hope this Bill dies in committee. If it passes, Summers will run for re-election in 2006 on the basis of having produced this wonderful law? and of having been suitably busy.
Mike Kole is chair of the Libertarian Party of Hamilton County (Noblesville) and candidate for Secretary of State (2006).
Libertarian Writers' Bureau http://www.writersbureau.org
green cleaning service Park Ridge ..There are no stupid questions, only stupid people. Ask an... Read More
The US Homeland Security is worried about Hydrofoil or Skimmer... Read More
As we increase our populations every new soul will require... Read More
Recent international wars and the often spectacular ways in which... Read More
In these times when states are suffering extreme downward pressure... Read More
US Steel prices have cost franchisees in my company and... Read More
Here are some miscellaneous thoughts on issues many of which... Read More
The great leader and Senator from New York and wife... Read More
The recent scathing remarks by High Court Judge Richard Mawrey... Read More
With respect to the States' databases, you may not locate... Read More
The evacuation of Gaza is now completed, and the world... Read More
Fuel costs seem to rank high in surveys of US... Read More
It appears we are having a terrible situation with the... Read More
As we reel from the news of the recent bombings... Read More
Three years ago I published a book of short stories... Read More
They do not allow the criticism of the president in... Read More
..."history may judge us to be the real bully if,... Read More
The number of countries in the world at the moment... Read More
Compulsory-attendance laws force parents to send their children to public... Read More
Currently the United States has weapons, which can shoot around... Read More
Our Airports have excess capacity, which is not being used... Read More
Veterans Affairs Employees using government credit cards on personal items?... Read More
The FBI recently before Congress stated that Eco-Terrorism was on... Read More
I hope to provide a starting point for the serious... Read More
This is a thought on the study of Home and... Read More
cleaning help near Bannockburn ..The RSS is getting feedback from its 140 pracharaks or... Read More
The clause (c) of Electronic Crime Act 2004 has been... Read More
All countries have specific things that are abundant in the... Read More
How much oil can travel through a pipeline? It depends... Read More
As of late steroid use in sports has been the... Read More
There are many types of fuels besides that gasoline we... Read More
The entry by telephone and cable companies into the Internet... Read More
Last week, the media coverage called the airplane crash in... Read More
PolicyFederal Fair Housing accessibility requirements for new multifamily buildings should... Read More
The most damaging factor to our economy today is the... Read More
Recently in Maine, I talked with a gentleman and we... Read More
When organising a country or a group of people in... Read More
Heavens, what are we up against? It seems these days... Read More
The partisan feuding in the U.S. Senate over federal judicial... Read More
IN A DAY AND AGE where one voice screaming among... Read More
It appears we are having a terrible situation with the... Read More
I. WARS ARE BASIC CONFLICTS OVER LAND. II. BOUNDARIES. THE... Read More
President Bush and Secretary Powell should hang their heads in... Read More
I've decided to go public with my intentions: I will... Read More
The Randolphs:Peyton Randolph was the first President of the United... Read More
We know we can cloak a giant airship from those... Read More
"Had there not been outsourcing and utilization of cheaper resources... Read More
When North Americans discuss Cuba, they always focus the intense... Read More
Ever wonder why labor unions consistently endorse democrats over republicans... Read More
A Governmental commission, headed personally by the Prime Minister has... Read More
Political |