I always have to remember to take a deep breath when examining the laws being proposed by our grand Legislature. I detest most of the new legislation on the table, but have to forgive our representatives in the House and Senate for it. After all, writing laws is what a Legislature does, and if they don't write enough laws, it can begin to look like they've been loafing.
Call me strange, but I rather prefer a Legislature that goofs off and under produces new laws. I'm convinced we have enough of them already, and agree with Mark Twain, who famously said that no man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the Legislature is in session.
Mainly, that is because no lawmaker wants to look like a slacker, especially so soon after an election. It's bad form. As a result, we get some hideous proposals that I would chalk up as an effort to hide behind some broad good intention while looking meaningful, or at least busy.
House Bill 1508 is a textbook case as one such proposal.
Representative Vanessa Summers, an Indianapolis Democrat, has introduced legislation that would prohibit the use of cell phones, making exceptions for hands-free devices and for emergency use. The proposed fine for violations of the law would be up to $25.
The intent is to make our streets a little less hazardous. We have all groused at the idiot guilty of driving while in conversation that cut us off or made us miss a light, and we have cursed the driver and his cell phone. Summers' proposal takes its cue from similar laws passed in New York and the District of Columbia. As everyone knows, these cities now have the safest streets in the world.
This law is rife with problems, from practical application to the higher concerns of individual liberty.
I know four friends, right off the top of my head, who would gladly pay up to $25, as a cost of doing business. They think this highly of each and every one of their calls. $25 is no kind of deterrent for these people.
What is emergency use? I define emergency use of a cell phone as a frantic call to a friend because I suddenly had two tickets offered to me for a Colts' playoff game, and I have to accept within five minutes, or the tickets will be passed on to a co-worker. My wife defines it as having found a deal on furniture, and she's on her way home so I can look at fabric swatches. I'm betting that this is not what the Representative has in mind. Some revisions will be in order.
But why just cell phones? If the real intent of the law is to eliminate distractions from our roadways, why not ban them all? Summers could justifiably expand the proposal to include a ban on smoking in the car, adjusting the radio or inserting a Britney Spears CD, eating fast food, scolding the rug rats in the backseat, talking with your spouse, shaving or applying makeup, doing the crossword puzzle, using a laptop computer, calling for on-screen directions to Starbucks, and rehearsing your excuse that explains your tardiness to the boss.
Could we really ban Britney Spears CDs? I digress.
Before the law is done with revisions, no common person will be able to read and understand it, and mainly, drivers will just continue to take their chances.
This begs the significant philosophical question: Why bother?
Isn't it sufficient that citations can already be issued if the use of a cell phone is the cause of an accident? Why pile on? No harm, no foul: If the use of a cell phone isn't endangering anyone in the moment, why penalize for the harm that was not caused?
Ah, the law is to be a deterrent, to eliminate the possibility of harm. But won't it also become more than that? How much of a stretch is it to envision police pulling over drivers who endanger nobody on a deserted road at 11pm, but who are guilty of making a cell call, just so the officer can meet his monthly quota? Isn't that a harm all its own?
Say, if the police pull a driver over to the side of the road, isn't that the sort of distraction that could cause an accident? It should be banned!
Let's hope this Bill dies in committee. If it passes, Summers will run for re-election in 2006 on the basis of having produced this wonderful law? and of having been suitably busy.
Mike Kole is chair of the Libertarian Party of Hamilton County (Noblesville) and candidate for Secretary of State (2006).
Libertarian Writers' Bureau http://www.writersbureau.org
Rolling Meadows Cadillac Escalade rental .. Lockport Chicago limo O’HareWhat ordinary people are saying about U.S. televangelist Pat Robertson... Read More
Ok, here is what happened: On March 31, 2005, Pat... Read More
Believe it or not, every theatre, church, or Britney Spears... Read More
The filibuster as a political delaying tactic has been a... Read More
The evacuation of Gaza is now completed, and the world... Read More
Are you happy with all this so-called security after 9-11?... Read More
With the world's largest oil and natural gas reserves, second... Read More
The trade deficit with Canada is now 50 Billion per... Read More
There are no stupid questions, only stupid people. Ask an... Read More
It is important as populations expand to work on the... Read More
I am noticing an increasing and alarming rate to which... Read More
The People's Liberation Army of China invaded Tibet in 1949.... Read More
We see today a fierce unspoken competition between trucks and... Read More
There are many issues on the minds of US voters... Read More
Former Governor of Alaska, Jay Hammond, died at age 83,... Read More
Heavens, what are we up against? It seems these days... Read More
The number of countries in the world at the moment... Read More
I read an interesting article in foreign Affairs magazine last... Read More
UNAUTHORIZED HACKINGThe term "computer hacking" traditionally describes the penetration into... Read More
How much oil can travel through a pipeline? It depends... Read More
Unions are angry at the high salary of the executives... Read More
The clause (c) of Electronic Crime Act 2004 has been... Read More
Many non-profit groups are feeling upset that they are allowed... Read More
Recently I got to talking with a gentleman at a... Read More
Since the United States Government is promoting the whistle blower... Read More
Des Moines rental limo ..Rufus King: (Said to be the fifth most important person... Read More
Tax Evasion has been used to criminalize many, Nixon did... Read More
We learned some lessons in these last few wars. For... Read More
I like Bill O'Reilly. I do. I have read two... Read More
1. United States of America (USA)In the United States, legislation... Read More
When you see hooded Klansmen walking up Pennsylvania Avenue to... Read More
"The only time I open my mouth is when I... Read More
Blessed with Chinese GDP growth rates (7-8% annually in each... Read More
Many in the World Media are quick to judge the... Read More
In his bid for the presidency, John Kerry pronounced a... Read More
Many environmentalists are against roads through the forest because it... Read More
The steel tariff taxes a few years ago hurt industry... Read More
I've been thinking again. I know some of my readers... Read More
Having redundancies and today's technologies in transportation we have protected... Read More
Predicting the future is a tricky business. There have been... Read More
Earlier this month, I heard President George W. Bush and... Read More
The predominant discussion in the Indianapolis media over the proposed... Read More
Large parts of the world today suffer from a severe... Read More
This is a thought on the study of Home and... Read More
Japan lit its candles of pure, "noble sadness" on the... Read More
Non-lethal Goo Concepts have been tossed around by many war... Read More
Yes, Bush is two-faced. The two sides of the faces... Read More
As we watch fewer Americans voting it is no wonder... Read More
Mexico the country of Salsa, Tortillas and Corruption; I first... Read More
An American soldier is taken behind enemy lines and brainwashed... Read More
Political |