I always have to remember to take a deep breath when examining the laws being proposed by our grand Legislature. I detest most of the new legislation on the table, but have to forgive our representatives in the House and Senate for it. After all, writing laws is what a Legislature does, and if they don't write enough laws, it can begin to look like they've been loafing.
Call me strange, but I rather prefer a Legislature that goofs off and under produces new laws. I'm convinced we have enough of them already, and agree with Mark Twain, who famously said that no man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the Legislature is in session.
Mainly, that is because no lawmaker wants to look like a slacker, especially so soon after an election. It's bad form. As a result, we get some hideous proposals that I would chalk up as an effort to hide behind some broad good intention while looking meaningful, or at least busy.
House Bill 1508 is a textbook case as one such proposal.
Representative Vanessa Summers, an Indianapolis Democrat, has introduced legislation that would prohibit the use of cell phones, making exceptions for hands-free devices and for emergency use. The proposed fine for violations of the law would be up to $25.
The intent is to make our streets a little less hazardous. We have all groused at the idiot guilty of driving while in conversation that cut us off or made us miss a light, and we have cursed the driver and his cell phone. Summers' proposal takes its cue from similar laws passed in New York and the District of Columbia. As everyone knows, these cities now have the safest streets in the world.
This law is rife with problems, from practical application to the higher concerns of individual liberty.
I know four friends, right off the top of my head, who would gladly pay up to $25, as a cost of doing business. They think this highly of each and every one of their calls. $25 is no kind of deterrent for these people.
What is emergency use? I define emergency use of a cell phone as a frantic call to a friend because I suddenly had two tickets offered to me for a Colts' playoff game, and I have to accept within five minutes, or the tickets will be passed on to a co-worker. My wife defines it as having found a deal on furniture, and she's on her way home so I can look at fabric swatches. I'm betting that this is not what the Representative has in mind. Some revisions will be in order.
But why just cell phones? If the real intent of the law is to eliminate distractions from our roadways, why not ban them all? Summers could justifiably expand the proposal to include a ban on smoking in the car, adjusting the radio or inserting a Britney Spears CD, eating fast food, scolding the rug rats in the backseat, talking with your spouse, shaving or applying makeup, doing the crossword puzzle, using a laptop computer, calling for on-screen directions to Starbucks, and rehearsing your excuse that explains your tardiness to the boss.
Could we really ban Britney Spears CDs? I digress.
Before the law is done with revisions, no common person will be able to read and understand it, and mainly, drivers will just continue to take their chances.
This begs the significant philosophical question: Why bother?
Isn't it sufficient that citations can already be issued if the use of a cell phone is the cause of an accident? Why pile on? No harm, no foul: If the use of a cell phone isn't endangering anyone in the moment, why penalize for the harm that was not caused?
Ah, the law is to be a deterrent, to eliminate the possibility of harm. But won't it also become more than that? How much of a stretch is it to envision police pulling over drivers who endanger nobody on a deserted road at 11pm, but who are guilty of making a cell call, just so the officer can meet his monthly quota? Isn't that a harm all its own?
Say, if the police pull a driver over to the side of the road, isn't that the sort of distraction that could cause an accident? It should be banned!
Let's hope this Bill dies in committee. If it passes, Summers will run for re-election in 2006 on the basis of having produced this wonderful law? and of having been suitably busy.
Mike Kole is chair of the Libertarian Party of Hamilton County (Noblesville) and candidate for Secretary of State (2006).
Libertarian Writers' Bureau http://www.writersbureau.org
monthly home cleaning Buffalo Grove ..They do not allow the criticism of the president in... Read More
With respect to the States' databases, you may not locate... Read More
In an effort to assist our political leadership it would... Read More
News is spreading of the retirement of Supreme Court Justice... Read More
It appears we are getting a little bit of Sun... Read More
In the previous article, we described the various methods developed... Read More
The resignation from cabinet yesterday, Sunday, by the Israeli minister... Read More
It appears the Feds are suing Elliot Spitzer over his... Read More
IN A DAY AND AGE where one voice screaming among... Read More
INTRODUCTIONThe aim of writing this article is to encourage the... Read More
Possible UAV materials are infinite: Foam, Composite, Balsa Wood, Plastic,... Read More
For the business community 9-11 changed everything. In our company,... Read More
So you are ready to run for public office are... Read More
Question: Dr. Vaknin ? is it true that you are... Read More
Regarding the issues with the Space Shuttle and the in... Read More
This brings to our consciousness, issues concerning the ever rising... Read More
Why President Bush should have his second term? The arguments... Read More
As we watch fewer Americans voting it is no wonder... Read More
In typical bureaucratese, the pensive EBRD analyst ventures with the... Read More
Since the United States Government is promoting the whistle blower... Read More
An American soldier is taken behind enemy lines and brainwashed... Read More
Having been to every city in the country over the... Read More
Recently scientists have been watching the exponential growth of marine... Read More
With the recent threats from Bin Laden and Al Queda... Read More
I. WARS ARE BASIC CONFLICTS OVER LAND. II. BOUNDARIES. THE... Read More
scheduled maid service Mundelein ..Dust from Deserts and Particulate ControlThe greatest contributor to particulate... Read More
Quit paying the DEA to chase marijuana. We could save... Read More
Government budgets represent between 25% and 50% of he Gross... Read More
We know that the International Terrorists like the idea of... Read More
The civil war in Iraq seems to be much more... Read More
Question: Dr. Vaknin ? is it true that you are... Read More
One question not addressed in GM Crops and Monsanto Terminator... Read More
I. WARS ARE BASIC CONFLICTS OVER LAND. II. BOUNDARIES. THE... Read More
The recent Jakarta summit of Asia and Africa brought remembrance... Read More
Richard Nixon was by far a most fascinating and colorful... Read More
The Presidents Before Washington:From the moment that the first Declaration... Read More
Most citizens agree that we need the Federal Trade Commission... Read More
Well many have complained that the FBI and CIA dropped... Read More
Let's make one thing clear: This Dan Nelson Automotive fiasco... Read More
The Justice Department is at it again; promoting themselves in... Read More
The evacuation of Gaza is now completed, and the world... Read More
IN A DAY AND AGE where one voice screaming among... Read More
The North American Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was implemented on January... Read More
Guides for RetailersThe regulations about marketing pearls are listed in... Read More
With new environmental technologies and modern efficiency methods in mining... Read More
So you are ready to run for public office are... Read More
I've decided to go public with my intentions: I will... Read More
If slavery has not worked well, then cloning if it... Read More
Where are all the high-speed trains we were promised? Where... Read More
THE ECCLESIASTICAL GRANT:There are good things done by the hegemony.... Read More
Political |