I always have to remember to take a deep breath when examining the laws being proposed by our grand Legislature. I detest most of the new legislation on the table, but have to forgive our representatives in the House and Senate for it. After all, writing laws is what a Legislature does, and if they don't write enough laws, it can begin to look like they've been loafing.
Call me strange, but I rather prefer a Legislature that goofs off and under produces new laws. I'm convinced we have enough of them already, and agree with Mark Twain, who famously said that no man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the Legislature is in session.
Mainly, that is because no lawmaker wants to look like a slacker, especially so soon after an election. It's bad form. As a result, we get some hideous proposals that I would chalk up as an effort to hide behind some broad good intention while looking meaningful, or at least busy.
House Bill 1508 is a textbook case as one such proposal.
Representative Vanessa Summers, an Indianapolis Democrat, has introduced legislation that would prohibit the use of cell phones, making exceptions for hands-free devices and for emergency use. The proposed fine for violations of the law would be up to $25.
The intent is to make our streets a little less hazardous. We have all groused at the idiot guilty of driving while in conversation that cut us off or made us miss a light, and we have cursed the driver and his cell phone. Summers' proposal takes its cue from similar laws passed in New York and the District of Columbia. As everyone knows, these cities now have the safest streets in the world.
This law is rife with problems, from practical application to the higher concerns of individual liberty.
I know four friends, right off the top of my head, who would gladly pay up to $25, as a cost of doing business. They think this highly of each and every one of their calls. $25 is no kind of deterrent for these people.
What is emergency use? I define emergency use of a cell phone as a frantic call to a friend because I suddenly had two tickets offered to me for a Colts' playoff game, and I have to accept within five minutes, or the tickets will be passed on to a co-worker. My wife defines it as having found a deal on furniture, and she's on her way home so I can look at fabric swatches. I'm betting that this is not what the Representative has in mind. Some revisions will be in order.
But why just cell phones? If the real intent of the law is to eliminate distractions from our roadways, why not ban them all? Summers could justifiably expand the proposal to include a ban on smoking in the car, adjusting the radio or inserting a Britney Spears CD, eating fast food, scolding the rug rats in the backseat, talking with your spouse, shaving or applying makeup, doing the crossword puzzle, using a laptop computer, calling for on-screen directions to Starbucks, and rehearsing your excuse that explains your tardiness to the boss.
Could we really ban Britney Spears CDs? I digress.
Before the law is done with revisions, no common person will be able to read and understand it, and mainly, drivers will just continue to take their chances.
This begs the significant philosophical question: Why bother?
Isn't it sufficient that citations can already be issued if the use of a cell phone is the cause of an accident? Why pile on? No harm, no foul: If the use of a cell phone isn't endangering anyone in the moment, why penalize for the harm that was not caused?
Ah, the law is to be a deterrent, to eliminate the possibility of harm. But won't it also become more than that? How much of a stretch is it to envision police pulling over drivers who endanger nobody on a deserted road at 11pm, but who are guilty of making a cell call, just so the officer can meet his monthly quota? Isn't that a harm all its own?
Say, if the police pull a driver over to the side of the road, isn't that the sort of distraction that could cause an accident? It should be banned!
Let's hope this Bill dies in committee. If it passes, Summers will run for re-election in 2006 on the basis of having produced this wonderful law? and of having been suitably busy.
Mike Kole is chair of the Libertarian Party of Hamilton County (Noblesville) and candidate for Secretary of State (2006).
Libertarian Writers' Bureau http://www.writersbureau.org
licensed cleaning services Park Ridge ..Federal Regulations on Business Destroy America, these regulations are a... Read More
Is the only way to fight Fundamentalist Extremists becoming one... Read More
Long Term Environmental Effect of Plastics, Composites and Other Materials... Read More
UK Water RatesYOU CANNOT BE DISCONNECTED FOR WATER RATES DEBTSWater... Read More
The second amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees every American... Read More
Those of us hundreds of miles from ground zero sat... Read More
We are having a problem in America with Public Notaries,... Read More
Believe it or not, every theatre, church, or Britney Spears... Read More
Today we wish to examine a fallacy, or error in... Read More
"Had there not been outsourcing and utilization of cheaper resources... Read More
Thought of the day; Questions about the judicial system. If... Read More
It cities across America water is an issue, the flow... Read More
Well having studying the need for decreasing America's dependence on... Read More
Fifteen hours is a tremendous barrier. It is the obstacle... Read More
The idea is to have all the important items with... Read More
These leaders like the Rothschilds who backed Crowley's Hermetic Order... Read More
As I read the papers and watch the news day... Read More
Originally published in 1958, "The Ugly American" (Lederer & Burdick)... Read More
Having redundancies and today's technologies in transportation we have protected... Read More
Iran's objection to ratifying the International Atomic Energy Agency's Additional... Read More
A visitor to Moscow would be immediately struck by the... Read More
The man on the tape raised his hand, pointing a... Read More
Einstein when ask how did he believe WWIII would be... Read More
We have seen an increase in Snowbirds from Northern States... Read More
On June 16, 1972, a security guard at the Watergate... Read More
on demand house cleaning Arlington Heights ..Prosecutors with political ambitions are known to modify the truth... Read More
Many people make a lot of money in war. In... Read More
Since the court case was over turned against Arthur Anderson... Read More
The European Court of Justice ("ECJ") ruled in Praktiker Bau-... Read More
Will a bus running across the borders bring cordial relations... Read More
There is something egregiously wrong about a government that will... Read More
The Federal Trade Commission in their latest move to increase... Read More
Rufus King: (Said to be the fifth most important person... Read More
Airlines do not allow cell phones on board, but they... Read More
The Bill of Rights to our Constitution caused -- and... Read More
Earlier this month, I heard President George W. Bush and... Read More
United Liberation Front of Assam (ULFA), one of the most... Read More
President Bush's selection of the Hon. John Roberts is an... Read More
We see today a fierce unspoken competition between trucks and... Read More
The evacuation of Gaza is now completed, and the world... Read More
I am personally calling for a total disbanding of the... Read More
Presently Universities and Private Enterprise are working to build more... Read More
In the most rewarding new industries, there is often a... Read More
All the indicators show an improving economy and, finally, the... Read More
The NSA failed the American people and allowed the attack... Read More
With new environmental technologies and modern efficiency methods in mining... Read More
It appears we are having a terrible situation with the... Read More
The No Child Left Behind can work if the Federal... Read More
With the recent threats from Bin Laden and Al Queda... Read More
Conor MacDari was a Mason but his Masonry deplored the... Read More
Political |