When organising a country or a group of people in need of structuring, people tend to automatically sidestep ideologies that do not take authority imposed from above for granted. Anarchists and other proponents of alternative rule almost by definition are seen as destructive elements in a society. Yet old time and modern thinkers on the subject might have some viable and decent ideas for future state organisation.
The unwieldy mess called the internet gives rise to many new thoughts and also causes many people to revisit older ideals and the alternative scene is resultantly more vibrant than ever. Its frequent intersection with the mainstream only adds to the clout of its substance. Going about researching the possibilities for anarchy as a viable alternative to a current system of government ought to be as chaotic as we can make it if we want to keep in line with the subject's concept. But we need to keep in mind that whilst we're digging, the results are streamlined by algorithms.
Surfing the web and drawing 'chaotically' from the input of various disciplines on anarchy throws off quite interesting results. Taking anarchy at face value, you realise soon your hunch as to why it has such a negative connotation is right. To be fair, situations in which anarchy gets bad press, are almost invariably justified. Not only do anarchists rear often ugly heads when they have issues with incumbent governments that tie them together as an impromptu group of people for short stretches of times only, with a negative spirit as a combining agent, seemingly too weak to justify the action. They often continue to destroy for the sake of destruction only.
Anarchy and regime change go hand in hand. Most of the times that anarchists are seen 'live' in action, they are -true to the nature of their political inclination- not organised in any way and they generally serve only to achieve short term goals before they go back to their ordinary lives. Anarchists can have very justified opinions, but in many cases their action is nevertheless condemned by the majority of fellow country men in favor of a new organised government.
The situation in Kyrgyzstan during the onset of the American invasion most recently brought the topic to bear for renewed analysis and prior to that, the Iraq invasion by American troops yielded fresh material for students of international law to break their heads over in years to come.
Due to the rather short term nature of anarchy when it is a 'live' concept, there is a lot of obscurity around how systems based on no rule or anarchy would be able to function in a positive way. There is no area or country in the world that has seen a situation of anarchy through for more than a decade by choice. Yet this does not mean that the concept is not pondered by more selfrespecting scholars of all disciplines. A quick browse on the internet reveals tons of information.
The concepts that would create true anarchic systems as mature alternatives for governments are somewhat more decent than you would hope or expect, depending on your notion of adventure or distaste for your current government. By definition, anarchists oppose merely government, not order or society. "Liberty is the Mother, not the Daughter of Order" wrote Proudhon, and most self respecting thinkers pondering anarchic ideals agree. Kropotkin, put it, "No destruction of the existing order is possible, if at the time of the overthrow, or of the struggle leading to the overthrow, the idea of what is to take the place of what is to be destroyed is not always present in the mind. Even the theoretical criticism of the existing conditions is impossible, unless the critic has in mind a more or less distinct picture of what he would have in place of the existing state. Consciously or unconsciously, the ideal, the conception of something better is forming in the mind of everyone who criticizes social institutions."
Studying the input that various disciplines have on the subject makes you understand some more why anarchy is rather impossible to achieve in any other way than the unpremeditated violence it comes disguised as mostly.
Economists, the experts if not inventors of the models so heavily in use in all disciplines now, are refreshingly unscrupulous in doing away with the state organisation as we know it today, yet the alternatives they come up with turn out often more tedious than what governments propose anyway. However, the economists do have most leeway it seems to argue the case for greater thought of alternative rule. The current rise of libertarian thought that's the by product of US global dominance goes hand in hand with the ideas that economists have been mumbling on about for ages; leave the world to its chaos and one way or other an order will emerge. Most of them base their systems on the appropriation of property in some way or other, which might be a good idea. Basing your initial foundation around who owns what is proving a workable concept if you look at the European Union. But somehow it feels a bit hollow and to only have economic principles ruling a society would essentially be degrading for humanity.
The ideas of other scholars provide more exciting input. Philosophers come out with by far the most interesting ideas but it might be frustrating to gauge just how consequential or tennable their views are for the rest of the world. The current trend in the academies is to loosen the philosophical debate from the belief that it is arguing about a real reality. This has opened up the discipline to the condemnation that their so called 'language games' is reducing the philosophers to fools rather than wise men. Yet this dismissal is unfounded, because not all philosophers stick to the idea that reality is merely known through language and even if this were the case anyway, there would still be too much value in this to dismiss it.
From practical point of view however, the philosophers come in most handy when structured thought about alternative society organisation is focused on technology or science or a mixture of both. The debate in the sciences and in the philosophy of science over whether reality is determined by interwoven forces or whether there is no relation between them -the battle between determinists and pluralists- is by far not resolved. Yet, given modern society's leaning to include anything to do with our immediate future, it is likely that not only will we see this debate feature prominently in any research on alternative ways of organising real life, but also in the established system. In fact, the anarchization of life has started ages ago, and we simply need to realise it.
All efforts by humans are geared toward mastering the dizzying intricacies of life some way or other, but the speed at which this takes place is a determining factor for the success rate more than anything else. The sciences provide this speed, so it's no wonder that the rest of the disciplines are gathered around this consternation and have started to provide their tools in a scientific light.
That is why it is interesting to see what's going on in the philosophy of science. It appears to yield ideas for finding decisive answers as to whether the philosophers are right in stating that researching the chances for a country to be ruled by alternative rule might be pointless because -as many economists, philosophers and scientists claim- the way reality interrelates is determined by forces we do not have a chance to control. The debate is by dint of the nature of the perceived progress of the sciences imperative for any initial thought on the way society can be organised alternatively.
Angelique van Engelen is a copy writer/journalist at http://www.contentclix.com based in Amsterdam. She also contributes to a blog at http://www.contentclix.com
cleaning help near Mundelein ...OH MAN!Here we go again. I guess now the "proof... Read More
Contrary to the Hobbesian prediction of anarchy (freedom) and brutish... Read More
Many MLM sales people mean well but they inadvertently commit... Read More
For a short time I worked as a union officer... Read More
We know that in Maryland, which some call "Merry Land"... Read More
Indian and Pakistan and nuclear war. What does the world... Read More
(1) Each person is to have an equal right to... Read More
What has really changed in the housing market with regards... Read More
In the future when we decide to help nations vote... Read More
North Korea and diplomatic games; something has to give and... Read More
The clause (c) of Electronic Crime Act 2004 has been... Read More
In today's Rants from Lance session I address the question... Read More
Rufus King: (Said to be the fifth most important person... Read More
For many years now, I have been the proud holder... Read More
Recently the FTC, Federal Trade Commission put forth a report... Read More
Many are condemning the latest GM Terminator seeds. Yet there... Read More
Many folks who are pro-NASA and Pro-Space Colonies say that... Read More
The expertise and advancement of the evolution of man and... Read More
Without the flow of fuel our very mobile society comes... Read More
The City of Portland is going after any small business,... Read More
We need more oversight and transparency in government. We need... Read More
Is Ohio Manufacturing Sector really unable to compete in the... Read More
Currently when we transport troops we use large cargo planes... Read More
Having been to every city in the country over the... Read More
Currently the US Army is having trouble recruiting. These problems... Read More
insured cleaning company Des Plaines ...So you are ready to run for public office are... Read More
1) IS HAVING A DEMOCRACY MORE EFFECTIVE IN ADDRESSING POLITICAL... Read More
The predominant discussion in the Indianapolis media over the proposed... Read More
When this president's father was in the Oval Office, he... Read More
It appears the Feds are suing Elliot Spitzer over his... Read More
Mexico the country of Salsa, Tortillas and Corruption; I first... Read More
I would like to discuss the blocked persons list of... Read More
One of my favourite pieces of music is the Sex... Read More
There are many issues on the minds of US voters... Read More
I would like to discuss a few issues we have... Read More
Since the United States Government is promoting the whistle blower... Read More
The CBR taxes the Pakistani source income of nonresident individuals... Read More
Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Men desire power. Give power to... Read More
I believe it would be good for the economy for... Read More
I would like to pose a question. I am unsure... Read More
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development issued a report... Read More
[Author's Note: Another essay that I wrote on notebook paper... Read More
The prosecutors in the Martha Stewart Case used testimony from... Read More
This, of course, is a political decision. There is no... Read More
Japan lit its candles of pure, "noble sadness" on the... Read More
Our government is set up like a modern day franchise.... Read More
You, the reader, should be aware of my affluence of... Read More
The People's Liberation Army of China invaded Tibet in 1949.... Read More
As of late steroid use in sports has been the... Read More
Economy is called the dismal science because it pretends to... Read More
Political |