When organising a country or a group of people in need of structuring, people tend to automatically sidestep ideologies that do not take authority imposed from above for granted. Anarchists and other proponents of alternative rule almost by definition are seen as destructive elements in a society. Yet old time and modern thinkers on the subject might have some viable and decent ideas for future state organisation.
The unwieldy mess called the internet gives rise to many new thoughts and also causes many people to revisit older ideals and the alternative scene is resultantly more vibrant than ever. Its frequent intersection with the mainstream only adds to the clout of its substance. Going about researching the possibilities for anarchy as a viable alternative to a current system of government ought to be as chaotic as we can make it if we want to keep in line with the subject's concept. But we need to keep in mind that whilst we're digging, the results are streamlined by algorithms.
Surfing the web and drawing 'chaotically' from the input of various disciplines on anarchy throws off quite interesting results. Taking anarchy at face value, you realise soon your hunch as to why it has such a negative connotation is right. To be fair, situations in which anarchy gets bad press, are almost invariably justified. Not only do anarchists rear often ugly heads when they have issues with incumbent governments that tie them together as an impromptu group of people for short stretches of times only, with a negative spirit as a combining agent, seemingly too weak to justify the action. They often continue to destroy for the sake of destruction only.
Anarchy and regime change go hand in hand. Most of the times that anarchists are seen 'live' in action, they are -true to the nature of their political inclination- not organised in any way and they generally serve only to achieve short term goals before they go back to their ordinary lives. Anarchists can have very justified opinions, but in many cases their action is nevertheless condemned by the majority of fellow country men in favor of a new organised government.
The situation in Kyrgyzstan during the onset of the American invasion most recently brought the topic to bear for renewed analysis and prior to that, the Iraq invasion by American troops yielded fresh material for students of international law to break their heads over in years to come.
Due to the rather short term nature of anarchy when it is a 'live' concept, there is a lot of obscurity around how systems based on no rule or anarchy would be able to function in a positive way. There is no area or country in the world that has seen a situation of anarchy through for more than a decade by choice. Yet this does not mean that the concept is not pondered by more selfrespecting scholars of all disciplines. A quick browse on the internet reveals tons of information.
The concepts that would create true anarchic systems as mature alternatives for governments are somewhat more decent than you would hope or expect, depending on your notion of adventure or distaste for your current government. By definition, anarchists oppose merely government, not order or society. "Liberty is the Mother, not the Daughter of Order" wrote Proudhon, and most self respecting thinkers pondering anarchic ideals agree. Kropotkin, put it, "No destruction of the existing order is possible, if at the time of the overthrow, or of the struggle leading to the overthrow, the idea of what is to take the place of what is to be destroyed is not always present in the mind. Even the theoretical criticism of the existing conditions is impossible, unless the critic has in mind a more or less distinct picture of what he would have in place of the existing state. Consciously or unconsciously, the ideal, the conception of something better is forming in the mind of everyone who criticizes social institutions."
Studying the input that various disciplines have on the subject makes you understand some more why anarchy is rather impossible to achieve in any other way than the unpremeditated violence it comes disguised as mostly.
Economists, the experts if not inventors of the models so heavily in use in all disciplines now, are refreshingly unscrupulous in doing away with the state organisation as we know it today, yet the alternatives they come up with turn out often more tedious than what governments propose anyway. However, the economists do have most leeway it seems to argue the case for greater thought of alternative rule. The current rise of libertarian thought that's the by product of US global dominance goes hand in hand with the ideas that economists have been mumbling on about for ages; leave the world to its chaos and one way or other an order will emerge. Most of them base their systems on the appropriation of property in some way or other, which might be a good idea. Basing your initial foundation around who owns what is proving a workable concept if you look at the European Union. But somehow it feels a bit hollow and to only have economic principles ruling a society would essentially be degrading for humanity.
The ideas of other scholars provide more exciting input. Philosophers come out with by far the most interesting ideas but it might be frustrating to gauge just how consequential or tennable their views are for the rest of the world. The current trend in the academies is to loosen the philosophical debate from the belief that it is arguing about a real reality. This has opened up the discipline to the condemnation that their so called 'language games' is reducing the philosophers to fools rather than wise men. Yet this dismissal is unfounded, because not all philosophers stick to the idea that reality is merely known through language and even if this were the case anyway, there would still be too much value in this to dismiss it.
From practical point of view however, the philosophers come in most handy when structured thought about alternative society organisation is focused on technology or science or a mixture of both. The debate in the sciences and in the philosophy of science over whether reality is determined by interwoven forces or whether there is no relation between them -the battle between determinists and pluralists- is by far not resolved. Yet, given modern society's leaning to include anything to do with our immediate future, it is likely that not only will we see this debate feature prominently in any research on alternative ways of organising real life, but also in the established system. In fact, the anarchization of life has started ages ago, and we simply need to realise it.
All efforts by humans are geared toward mastering the dizzying intricacies of life some way or other, but the speed at which this takes place is a determining factor for the success rate more than anything else. The sciences provide this speed, so it's no wonder that the rest of the disciplines are gathered around this consternation and have started to provide their tools in a scientific light.
That is why it is interesting to see what's going on in the philosophy of science. It appears to yield ideas for finding decisive answers as to whether the philosophers are right in stating that researching the chances for a country to be ruled by alternative rule might be pointless because -as many economists, philosophers and scientists claim- the way reality interrelates is determined by forces we do not have a chance to control. The debate is by dint of the nature of the perceived progress of the sciences imperative for any initial thought on the way society can be organised alternatively.
Angelique van Engelen is a copy writer/journalist at http://www.contentclix.com based in Amsterdam. She also contributes to a blog at http://www.contentclix.com
best cleaning company Highland Park ..In this day and age of tattletale, whistleblower heroes and... Read More
Quit paying the DEA to chase marijuana. We could save... Read More
Ohio's transportation sector seems to be strong, even with Ohio's... Read More
In many reports we see that the Federal Trade Commission... Read More
Is Ohio Manufacturing Sector really unable to compete in the... Read More
In today's Rants from Lance session I address the question... Read More
"Had there not been outsourcing and utilization of cheaper resources... Read More
An irresponsible Chinese General made a very telling comment recently.... Read More
Today we wish to examine a fallacy, or error in... Read More
Many of those who wish to fight for our country... Read More
For many years now, I have been the proud holder... Read More
Indian and Pakistan and nuclear war. What does the world... Read More
1) IS HAVING A DEMOCRACY MORE EFFECTIVE IN ADDRESSING POLITICAL... Read More
30 years ago, California, later followed by other states, decided... Read More
The gun control debate in America is a battle between... Read More
Rational, sober, logical citizens wonder what exactly the terrorists want.... Read More
You, the reader, should be aware of my affluence of... Read More
The CBR taxes the Pakistani source income of nonresident individuals... Read More
When I was growing up, I actually considered a career... Read More
Thought of the day; Questions about the judicial system. If... Read More
Michael Moore asserts the following in his political film Fahrenheit... Read More
Believe it or not, every theatre, church, or Britney Spears... Read More
Legislation is getting legs to further curtail your use of... Read More
For the business community 9-11 changed everything. In our company,... Read More
IntroductionThe way one lyrist has written, "Hum logo ko samajh... Read More
high-end home cleaning Winnetka ..We are destroying our freedoms and slowing innovation, due to... Read More
Rufus King: (Said to be the fifth most important person... Read More
Airlines do not allow cell phones on board, but they... Read More
The Federal Trade Commission in their latest move to increase... Read More
I watch the TV news and I get angry. I... Read More
As a result of the conflict analysis exercise and a... Read More
I believe it would be good for the economy for... Read More
It appears we are getting a little bit of Sun... Read More
The official figures are staggering: 35% of the workforce -... Read More
I read an interesting article in foreign Affairs magazine last... Read More
Businesses advertising alcohol either in TV or non-broadcast format need... Read More
I heard on the news this week how America continues... Read More
We know that in Maryland, which some call "Merry Land"... Read More
We are told by out leadership that we risk loss... Read More
The North American Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was implemented on January... Read More
At the start of the US involvement in WWII Joseph... Read More
The resignation from cabinet yesterday, Sunday, by the Israeli minister... Read More
An American soldier is taken behind enemy lines and brainwashed... Read More
The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) estimated that there were... Read More
"Like humans void of soul or mind, they jeered and... Read More
The new law "Special Protective, Antidumping and Import Compensatory Measures"... Read More
In the fields of juvenile justice policy and programming, there... Read More
Fearful that terrorists will next target Australia, Prime Minister John... Read More
Possible UAV materials are infinite: Foam, Composite, Balsa Wood, Plastic,... Read More
Heavens, what are we up against? It seems these days... Read More
Political |