The Connecticut Conference of Municipalities (CCM) is interested in the state's budgetary health, so that the conference can estimate how much money the state will transfer to local towns and municipalities. To determine the fiscal health of any state, the first place to examine is expenditures on prescription drugs for the state's Medicaid program. Rising prescription drug costs are the single most important explanatory factor for the increases in health care costs, health insurance premiums across the country, and state budget deficits. Connecticut is no exception.
Prescription Drug Formulary. With little or no public fanfare, Connecticut took an important step in gaining control over escalating drug costs when the state legislature passed a preferred drug formulary. The formulary requires pharmaceutical companies to provide the state with "supplemental rebates" above and beyond those already mandated by federal law for prescription drugs provided under the Medicaid law. The pharmaceutical industry is suing to stop the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services from approving these kinds of rebate plans; the pharmaceutical industry contends the states are violating federal law by establishing drug formularies based upon the cost of drugs, not the efficacy of the medications. But the whole point of a preferred drug formulary is to contain costs, so naturally the price of drugs---on and off the formulary---should be relevant.
Connecticut had to take some step to contain its cost of providing state-supported prescription drugs. A presentation at a 2001 meeting of the International Society for Pharmaceutical Economics and Outcomes Research, available on the Internet at http://www.ispor.org/ meetings/va0503/presentations_pdf/poster/PHP17.pdf, showed the national average cost for the top five maintenance drugs prescribed through Medicaid was $1200/person. However, the cost in Connecticut for these same top five Medicaid-supplied drugs was $2,732/person. Clearly, Connecticut needed a range of different financial controls to bring its prescription drug costs in line with the national average. The two main forms of price controls adopted in Connecticut were the drug formulary and the prior authorization plan.
The preferred drug formulary and the prior authorization plan apply to Connecticut's Medicaid, General Assistance, and ConnPace programs. The state legislature exempted a certain class of drugs, i.e., atypical anti-psychotic drugs, from the preferred formulary. In Connecticut, a pharmacist shall not dispense any initial maintenance drug prescription for which there is a generic substitute without obtaining prior authorization from the state's Social Services department. These two price control measures have enabled Connecticut to exercise modest control over state spending on prescription drugs. That is good news for Connecticut taxpayers and the CCM.
Burgeoning Health Care Needs. But Connecticut still faces challenges on the health care front. The National Alliance for Mental Illness reports Connecticut has (1) 6000 people who are homeless and mentally ill, (2) almost 2600 people with serious mental illnesses in nursing homes, (3) over 12% of the CT prison population with serious mental illnesses and over 70% with addictive disorders, and (4) emergency rooms overflowing with children and adults in crisis with no place to go. "Yet, the [Governor's budget] has proposed eliminating all medical help for poor, single adults, slashing medical insurance for working poor families, cutting community health centers, and several more pages of reckless cuts and fees imposed on people who survive at less than 50% of the federal poverty level," according to the Connecticut chapter of the National Alliance. Traditionally, neither the county nor the municipal governments have been required to pay for medical services for the poor and those without insurance. However, county and municipal facilities will feel the impact, directly and indirectly, of state budgetary cuts in health care services.
Governing.com. Outside of health care expenditures, Connecticut is facing the same budget deficit environment as the other forty-nine states. The downturn in the economy has meant less tax revenues were collected from all sources. At this point, Connecticut needs to focus on reshaping its tax and spending habits in a way that induces future economic activity, rather than focus on even more ways to tax the citizens of Connecticut. In this regard, Connecticut has received very poor advice from Governing Magazine and its associated web site, governing.com.
In a special report entitled "Grading State Tax Systems," governing.com offers a prescription of forcing income taxes on states that don't have them and raising these taxes for states that do. The report is not an objective piece of public finance analysis. It is propaganda for a pro-tax, bigger government services, bigger government spending agenda. The report ranks every state without a state income tax as ipso facto unfair and regressive in its tax structure. The absence of debilitating state income taxes in no way establishes the unfairness of a state's revenue tax stream, as evidenced by the fact that polls show both rich and poor, Democrat and Republican, young and old, favor the status quo over the introduction of a state income tax. The ipso facto conclusions of governing.com are nothing more than unsubstantiated ipse dixit.
The governing.com report emphasizes that elected officials should never give the taxpayers an opportunity to vote on tax increases or new forms of taxation. Instead of government of the people, and by the people, and for the people, the governing.com report adopts the position that government should come at the people and try to sock them with as many taxes as necessary to achieve a desirable level of local and state public services. Never, never give the citizens a chance to vote on tax increases, governing.com advises its readers, because citizens will routinely and consistently vote to keep taxes down. The premise of the governing.com report is un-American, un-democratic, and unsupportable.
Connecticut's income tax. Consider the report's unabashed endorsement of Connecticut's state income tax: "What's more, there's a widespread belief on the part of many voters that any change is going to hurt them. A little more than a decade ago, that was precisely the situation in Connecticut, which did not have an income tax but did have high taxes on all sales, corporate profits, utilities and estates. There were recommendations to acquire an income tax, but governors Ella Grasso and William A. O'Neill both took 'the pledge' to make sure that such a thing would never sully the liberty-loving citizens of the Nutmeg State. Residents who would have clearly benefited from the new tax dreaded it, believing those who predicted that once it was installed, it would just be raised and raised again until it didn't pay to get out of bed and go to work in Connecticut."
"As existing taxes skyrocketed, Governor Lowell Weicker pushed for the new tax. He was burned in effigy, but he and a courageous group of legislators worked to bring the new income stream into existence in 1991. And, despite all the dire predictions, the income tax seems to have given Connecticut a balanced tax system for the first time. 'In 1990, we had a sign on the door, don't invest here, don't form a corporation here and don't retire here,' says Connecticut state Senator William Nickerson, the ranking member of the Finance, Revenue, and Bonding Committee. 'Tax reform took away significant disincentives.'"
Today, the budget crises in Florida, Tennessee, and Texas are in fact far less perilous than most of the states that have state income taxes. In fact, governing.com would have egg on its face to learn that Tennessee begins its second year of budget hearings under Democratic Governor Phil Bredesen with a $150 million surplus, not a deficit, from last fiscal year.
Similarly, governing.com goes on to state, "Today, Florida, Tennessee and Texas are all facing serious financial problems. They don't have an income tax. And leaders in these states have taken 'the pledge' to make sure they don't get one." The governing.com piece offers these types of assertions without any proof. Today, the budget crises in Florida, Tennessee, and Texas are in fact far less perilous than most of the states that have state income taxes. In fact, governing.com would have egg on its face to learn that Tennessee begins its second year of budget hearings under Democratic Governor Phil Bredesen with a $150 million surplus, not a deficit, from last fiscal year. True to his frugal management style, Bredesen has pledged that all of the surplus funds will be used to replenish the state's reserve funds, which were largely depleted in budget wrangling in prior years.
The remainder of this article can be found at http://riskmgmt.biz/lawnews/ctbudget.htm
Dr. Michael A. S. Guth, Ph.D., J.D., is a consulting economist, legal brief writer, and law newspaper Editor-in-Chief. He writes a variety of articles on constitutional law, elder care, consumer credit card debt, appellate court term reviews, and law and society. See http://riskmgmt.biz/ for an introduction to his legal work, and http://riskmgmt.biz/ for a listing of many of his articles. Dr. Guth writes legal articles and briefs for other law firms, and he assists pro se parties (those without a lawyer) in preparing documents they can file in court such as motions pertaining to child custody, visitation interference, and child support defense.
Rolling Meadows Cadillac Escalade rental .. Lockport Chicago limo O’HareThe idea that the majority shows the will of the... Read More
There is a connection between economic growth and unemployment. There... Read More
Well, another election has come and gone in the US... Read More
In his bid for the presidency, John Kerry pronounced a... Read More
Heavens, what are we up against? It seems these days... Read More
What ordinary people are saying about U.S. televangelist Pat Robertson... Read More
Utah introduced a bill designed to limit the use of... Read More
"Similar to Medieval Inquisitions, judges have been given the authority,... Read More
There are no stupid questions, only stupid people. Ask an... Read More
For anyone who wishes to become an armchair General in... Read More
Most politicians are completely out to lunch and totally Machiavellian... Read More
Why is it that every single thing government does; it... Read More
At the start of the US involvement in WWII Joseph... Read More
Many in the World Media are quick to judge the... Read More
Policemen in many US cities are taking their new authority... Read More
Streamlining Homeland Security with a Free market flair? An idea... Read More
The recent scathing remarks by High Court Judge Richard Mawrey... Read More
I. OVERVIEWIn the wake of the September 11 terrorist attacks... Read More
Ever wonder why labor unions consistently endorse democrats over republicans... Read More
Unions are angry at the high salary of the executives... Read More
The Justice Department is at it again; promoting themselves in... Read More
Airlines do not allow cell phones on board, but they... Read More
In the previous article, we described the various methods developed... Read More
In the last Gulf War we saw thousands of enemy... Read More
I was dismayed to learn the other day, that my... Read More
Des Moines rental limo ..1. United States of America (USA)In the United States, legislation... Read More
Why did FDR say Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson and Count... Read More
China maybe stopping some of the SPAM coming into the... Read More
The furore in the BJP camp in India, triggered by... Read More
Each day the present geo-political reality confirms what The Tribulation... Read More
There's a new Michigan state register (at https://www.protectmichild.com/) in the... Read More
A governing.com report blast one of the major grassroots initiatives... Read More
As more and more cities and states set up websites... Read More
For more than a decade, you the American taxpayer have... Read More
The shouting is over and directions for the next four... Read More
Those of us hundreds of miles from ground zero sat... Read More
Ok, here is what happened: On March 31, 2005, Pat... Read More
Is the only way to fight Fundamentalist Extremists becoming one... Read More
Are you happy with all this so-called security after 9-11?... Read More
The No Child Left Behind can work if the Federal... Read More
(1) Each person is to have an equal right to... Read More
Prosecutors with political ambitions are known to modify the truth... Read More
You are not going to believe what is going on... Read More
Telemarketing and DO NOT CALL lists sure made headlines, but... Read More
Farmers will eventually be facing federal regulations involving air emissions... Read More
Every conflict has its economic moments and dimensions. The current... Read More
Ever wonder why labor unions consistently endorse democrats over republicans... Read More
It is time for a change. A change in philosophy,... Read More
Blessed with Chinese GDP growth rates (7-8% annually in each... Read More
Well, another election has come and gone in the US... Read More
Political |