There are no stupid questions, only stupid people. Ask an economist for proof of one of their pet theories and you'll find quickly that the age old axiom that we all learned in school and work place training seminars is dead wrong. You can ask a stupid question if you're talking to an economist and that question can, in fact, make you stupid.
It's a well accepted fact that scientists are not the greatest communicators around. They generally are not strong in the customer service or public relations fields. Scientists spend their time preaching to the well educated, well informed, scientific choir. When the time comes that a scientific discovery leads to a consumer product, it is not scientists that explain the benefits and dangers of the new product, a marketing company will handle that. Because of the disconnect between the science behind a product and the actual implementation of that science, there are a slew of products which are around 1.25% scientific fact and 98.75% marketing hype (take a look at your average diet pill). Consumers don't know the difference because scientists won't talk to us.
Economists also fancy themselves as scientists. They like to say that they have laws and they also don't feel the need to deign to speak to the general public about their work. They talk to each other, develop their theories, push for the implementation of those theories and generally think that Liberal Arts majors and auto mechanics should mind their own business. Maybe it's time that we lowly non-economists demand a few answers.
It's tremendously irksome to hear an economist speak about an economic law. Ask the economist to demonstrate the law and he will fall quickly to an explanation of the theories which, in his opinion, make the law true. Supply and Demand can only be verified by reading those theorists who endorse the idea. The theory cannot be measured, cannot be duplicated under scientific standards, cannot be certain to have the same outcome at all times, even given the same circumstances. It is therefore not a law. It's just a widely accepted theory.
I've got no problem with widely accepted theories. What I do find disturbing and even dangerous is the application of widely accepted theories into public policy without regard to whom is being hurt and without question as to whether or not the theory is working.
Take free trade for instance. It's an economic policy which is not demanded by the average working person, but which both major political parties endorse to some extent and which the Libertarian Party makes a cornerstone of it's platform. The theories all indicate that some job loss, even great displacement of a given society's workers, is to be expected. In fact, the displacement is a good thing, since it allows once unskilled laborers to study and become highly skilled technitions, or accountants or something. Unfortunately, the American people aren't privy to this part of the working economic theory and thusly aren't excited to hear that the reason that their job was offshore is due to India's comparative advantage in call center operations. The displaced worker may not feel that they are a worthy subject for the grand experiment of free trade.
Of course, no theory says that America has to be the winner in the free trade free-for-all rush to the top of the comparative/absolute advantage heap. No, economists don't often talk about nations at all. Their theories do not aim to find ways of make America the most economically powerful nation, or the richest, or the most comfortable; their theories work to ensure a true free market. The problem with a truly free market is that the displaced workers can just as easily be upper middle class Americans and the new skills that they may be acquiring just may be menial labor. Ask an economist why the displaced workers are always poor and always must be and I'll bet you money that they cannot give even a small piece of evidence to show a reason why that is so.
Yet our politicians, being taught economics in universities which are almost universally in support of free trade, themselves support free trade. They support an economic theory that has no evidence of actually being affective, but which may cause damage to the American economy, a fact which any honest free trade supporting economist would have to admit doesn't matter to them. Yet, the average person is not supposed to question these theories and certainly not the logic of the theorocrats that endorse them. If you fail to remain quietly on the sidelines of history and make the mistake of questioning the theory behind free trade, then you will be the recipient of a litany of the names of long dead authors who will all prove you wrong. You'll be called an idiot (trust me, I've had these discussions), they will threaten your mother's virtue before they admit that they can provide no evidence that they are correct.
Does a lack of evidence prove that the economists are wrong? Not at all. In fact, my desire for evidence is proof that I don't know enough about economics to ask more informed questions than, "can you prove that?" I do think, though, that is a damn fine place to start. Maybe more economists should start their path of theoretical enlightenment by questioning the fundamental truth of what they are being taught. Maybe economists should consider being the first scientists to learn customer service. If that seems like a bit of a demotion, just call it retraining for new economic conditions.
About The Author
Donald R. Carroll III is a student, insurance adjuster and freelance writer from Kansas City, Missouri.
shuttle from Midway Glen Ellyn ..The current field of political sciences is dominated by a... Read More
Hitler received a legacy from his Rothschild relations in Vienna... Read More
The Republican Party became popular due to its view on... Read More
The Jihad against the Western World will continue. It will... Read More
Do you ever wonder how everything gets to the super... Read More
An idea to defend oil infrastructure in the Middle East... Read More
This is a thought on the study of Home and... Read More
With people living longer we have some problems as those... Read More
The Flow of Trade is a major consideration of civilizations... Read More
Close to 500,000 people - one in four - live... Read More
It can be dangerous to engage in free speech. This... Read More
I'm getting a little tired of being lectured by that... Read More
We are told by out leadership that we risk loss... Read More
As you know Delta Airlines is close to bankruptcy. Their... Read More
I would like to pose a question. I am unsure... Read More
This brings to our consciousness, issues concerning the ever rising... Read More
I have witnessed a new era of security in the... Read More
The US-backed Road Map peace plan had no real chance... Read More
The steel tariff taxes a few years ago hurt industry... Read More
The first reaction of economies in transition is a sharp... Read More
When North Americans discuss Cuba, they always focus the intense... Read More
News is spreading of the retirement of Supreme Court Justice... Read More
Many are quick to point out the benefits of religion... Read More
The Federal trade Commission has a rule, which says that... Read More
We need more oversight and transparency in government. We need... Read More
shuttle from O'Hare North Chicago ..Their arrival portends rising local prices and a culture shock.... Read More
When you see hooded Klansmen walking up Pennsylvania Avenue to... Read More
Recently I met a man in a coffee shop, a... Read More
The Iranian elections are certainly interesting indeed. The ruling party... Read More
A friend of mine, who lives in the thick of... Read More
In 1966, Dr. Carroll Quigley, a professor of history at... Read More
[Author's Note: Another essay that I wrote on notebook paper... Read More
I, too, am saddened by the disaster in New Orleans... Read More
Large parts of the world today suffer from a severe... Read More
Many are very impressed with the NIMA (National Imagery and... Read More
Many have lost faith in the government and are completely... Read More
There is something egregiously wrong about a government that will... Read More
California Attorneys and politicians are to blame for the energy... Read More
In an age of terrorism, guerilla and total warfare the... Read More
In an effort to assist our political leadership it would... Read More
I've been thinking again. I know some of my readers... Read More
Every conflict has its economic moments and dimensions. The current... Read More
Due to the bizarre weather patterns this winter California got... Read More
The most damaging factor to our economy today is the... Read More
The idea is to have all the important items with... Read More
Possible UAV materials are infinite: Foam, Composite, Balsa Wood, Plastic,... Read More
Compulsory-attendance laws force parents to send their children to public... Read More
The US-backed Road Map peace plan had no real chance... Read More
Originally published in 1958, "The Ugly American" (Lederer & Burdick)... Read More
As baby boomers, we have been spoiled all of our... Read More
Political |